Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
NVBA 199er Pairs Thursday Session October 9, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   50.0      Section C  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   53.50   53.50  C   2     1     1    3/4    2     2    0.83(OB) Betsy Deering - June Gladding
  2   59.50   59.50  A   1                 2                1.07(OA) Thomas Keslin - Carol Goldstone
  3   48.50   48.50  A                                               Deanna Shuman - Lawrence Shuman
  4   46.50   46.50  C                                               Duncan Wainwright - Jovica Medic
  5   42.00   42.00  C                                               Patricia Greason - Rebecca Sekse

NVBA 199er Pairs Thursday Session October 9, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   50.0      Section C  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   47.00   47.00  A                                               Walt Pumo - Janice Pumo
  2   43.50   43.50  A                                               James Hewitt - Kenneth Linder
  3   53.50   53.50  A   2                3/4               0.70(OA) Alice Ling - Eleanor Linde
  4   62.50   62.50  C   1     1     1     1     1     1    1.43(OA) John Peterson - Richard Poznanski
  5   43.50   43.50  C                                               Jeanne Theis - Phil Theis

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A K Q 6 3
K 3
A 8 7 5
A 8
10 7 5 4
10 7 5
Q J 4 2
9 4
N
WE
S
9 2
Q J 9 8
10 9 6
J 7 6 2
20
3    4
13
J 8
A 6 4 2
K 3
K Q 10 5 3

NS 7N; NS 7; NS 7; NS 5; NS 5; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTN69904.000.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
5 NTS75203.001.001-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
5 NTN64901.502.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 NTN64901.502.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Theis-Theis
4 S64800.004.005-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
9 6 2
Q 10 8 6 5
9 7 4 2
3
Q 4 3
9 4
K 10 8
A K 10 5 2
N
WE
S
A K 5
K 7 3
A
Q J 9 8 6 4
2
12    17
9
J 10 8 7
A J 2
Q J 6 5 3
7

E 5N; W 4N; EW 5; EW 3; E 1; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E54003.500.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Theis-Theis
5 E54003.500.504-Wainwright-Medic vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
5 E64201.502.501-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
5 E64201.502.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 NTE54600.004.005-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 9 5
A J 10 9 8 6
A J
K 9
Q 8 6 4
K Q 7
8 4
10 6 5 4
N
WE
S
A J 7
4 2
K Q 9 7 5 2
Q 3
16
7    12
5
10 3 2
5 3
10 6 3
A J 8 7 2

N 3N; NS 2; N 2; EW 1; S 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31403.001.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 N31403.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Theis-Theis
2 N31403.001.005-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
4 N−1501.003.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 E31400.004.001-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Pumo-Pumo

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
10 8
9 6
K Q J 7 6 3
K J 2
J 7 5 3
Q 2
9
Q 9 8 7 6 3
N
WE
S
A K Q 6 4
10 7 3
A 4 2
A 4
10
5    17
8
9 2
A K J 8 5 4
10 8 5
10 5

EW 4; NS 3; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −500: NS 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−11003.500.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 3-Ling-Linde
4 E−11003.500.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Theis-Theis
4 S61401.502.501-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 E31401.502.504-Wainwright-Medic vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 E41700.004.005-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
Q J 7
A K Q 5
J 4 2
K Q 4
A 10 8 2
6 4
8 7
A 9 7 5 3
N
WE
S
9 6
8 7 2
9 6 5 3
J 10 8 6
18
8    1
13
K 5 4 3
J 10 9 3
A K Q 10
2

NS 5N; NS 5; NS 4; NS 5; NS 1; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN66904.000.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
4 S66803.001.001-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTN56602.002.005-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
4 S56500.503.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 3-Ling-Linde
4 N56500.503.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 5-Theis-Theis

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
9 4 3
J 2
K 8 5 3
K 10 4 3
A Q 2
K 10 8 6
A Q 7 2
A 5
N
WE
S
K J 7 6
4 3
J 10 6 4
J 8 7
7
19    6
8
10 8 5
A Q 9 7 5
9
Q 9 6 2

EW 3; EW 4; EW 2N; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11003.500.501-Deering-Gladding vs 5-Theis-Theis
3 NTW−11003.500.504-Wainwright-Medic vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTW36001.003.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTW36001.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTE36001.003.005-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Ling-Linde

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
7 5 4 2
9 8 6
K
K 9 8 7 5
Q 10 6
Q J 10
Q 10 8 3
J 10 3
N
WE
S
A 9 8
A K 3 2
9 7 6
Q 4 2
6
8    13
13
K J 3
7 5 4
A J 5 4 2
A 6

EW 1N; NS 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N−11004.000.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
1 NTW21203.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
1 NTN−22001.003.001-Deering-Gladding vs 5-Theis-Theis
1 NTN−22001.003.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
2 S−22001.003.005-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Ling-Linde

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
4
8
A J 7 4 3
Q 10 9 7 6 5
A K 8 5 3
K Q 7
9 5
A J 2
N
WE
S
Q J 7 6 2
A J 9 6 5 3
6
8
7
17    8
8
10 9
10 4 2
K Q 10 8 2
K 4 3

EW 6; EW 6; NS 4; EW 2N; NS 3; Par −500: NS 7×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W64803.001.001-Deering-Gladding vs 5-Theis-Theis
4 W64803.001.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
5 W64803.001.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
5 W75101.003.005-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Ling-Linde
6 ×W612100.004.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 1-Pumo-Pumo

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
A J 5 3
A K 4
K Q 3
Q 5 3
9 7 4 2
8 7 6
A 9 5
A 10 4
N
WE
S
K 10 8 6
J 9 2
10 8 6
K 7 6
19
8    7
6
Q
Q 10 5 3
J 7 4 2
J 9 8 2

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 4; NS 2; NS 3; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34003.001.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTN34003.001.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTN34003.001.005-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Ling-Linde
2 NTN31501.003.001-Deering-Gladding vs 5-Theis-Theis
1 N31100.004.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
K 7 4 3
K 10 4
8 2
A 10 8 5
A J 6
7 5 2
A J 10 5 3
9 2
N
WE
S
Q 8 5 2
A Q J 6
Q 9 6
Q 3
10
10    13
7
10 9
9 8 3
K 7 4
K J 7 6 4

EW 4; EW 4; EW 4; EW 2N; NS 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S−11004.000.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
2 W41302.501.501-Deering-Gladding vs 5-Theis-Theis
3 E41302.501.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
3 W61701.003.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTW46300.004.005-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Ling-Linde

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
8 6 3
J 8 3 2
K Q 10 7 5 2
A K 9 4
10 5 4 2
A K Q
J 4
N
WE
S
J 3
A K Q 7
10 9 6 4
A 8 6
6
17    14
3
Q 10 8 7 6 5 2
J 9
7 5
9 3

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 3; EW 4; EW 1; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E52004.000.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Ling-Linde
4 W54502.002.001-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
4 W54502.002.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
4 E54502.002.005-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 ×S−48000.004.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 5-Theis-Theis

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
Q 7 6 2
9 8 7 6 5 2
K
A 2
9
A J 4
Q 10 5
Q J 8 7 5 4
N
WE
S
K 10 5 4 3
10 3
J 9 4
K 10 6
9
10    7
14
A J 8
K Q
A 8 7 6 3 2
9 3

NS 5; NS 3; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N41703.500.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 N41703.500.505-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
2 S41302.002.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 5-Theis-Theis
2 N21101.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Ling-Linde
2 S2900.004.001-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A J 9 5 4
5 4 3
A J 10
6 5
10 7 6
K 10
K 6 5 4
K Q 10 4
N
WE
S
K Q 8 3 2
Q 9 6
A J 9 7 3
10
11    12
7
A J 8 7 2
Q 9 8 7 3 2
8 2

E 5; EW 3; W 4; N 2; EW 1N; NS 2; S 1; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×E−25004.000.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 5-Theis-Theis
3 E−11003.001.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
2 E21101.502.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Ling-Linde
2 E21101.502.505-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
4 ×E47900.004.001-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K 7
K 7 6 4 2
K J 8
J 8 3
J 8 3
J 9 3
A Q 7 3 2
7 6
N
WE
S
A Q 9 5
10 5
10 4
A K 9 4 2
11
8    13
8
10 6 4 2
A Q 8
9 6 5
Q 10 5

EW 2; EW 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N−1504.000.001-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
2 N−21002.501.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Ling-Linde
2 N−21002.501.504-Wainwright-Medic vs 5-Theis-Theis
2 E31400.503.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
2 E31400.503.505-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Hewitt-Linder

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 10 8
10 3
10 8
J 9 7 4 3
7 5
9 8 7
Q 7 5 4 3
8 6 5
N
WE
S
J 9 3 2
Q J 6
K J
A K Q 10
7
2    17
14
K 6 4
A K 5 4 2
A 9 6 2
2

N 3; NS 3; N 2N; S 2; S 1N; NS 2; N 2; S 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31404.000.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
2 W−21002.501.501-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTE−21002.501.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 3-Ling-Linde
2 NTN−11001.003.005-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
4 ×S−12000.004.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 5-Theis-Theis

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
10 9 6 2
K 10 7 5 4 3
4
8 6
Q J 5 4
Q J
A 6 5 3
K 9 3
N
WE
S
8
A 8 6 2
J 9 8 7 2
A J 5
3
13    10
14
A K 7 3
9
K Q 10
Q 10 7 4 2

E 4; EW 2N; W 3; NS 1; EW 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−11003.500.501-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 W−11003.500.505-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 W31101.502.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 5-Theis-Theis
3 W31101.502.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTE36000.004.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
Q J 5
A 7 6 5 2
8
9 8 5 4
A 10 9 6 3
J 4
K 7 5 4 3
J
N
WE
S
4 2
K Q 10 8 3
Q 6 2
A K 10
7
9    14
10
K 8 7
9
A J 10 9
Q 7 6 3 2

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S−21004.000.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 5-Theis-Theis
1 NTE31503.001.001-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 E41702.002.005-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTE34001.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
4 ×S−35000.004.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 6
10 8 2
7 3
A 9 8 7 6 2
A J 5 4
9
K Q J 9 6 5
5 4
N
WE
S
Q 10 8 7 3 2
A K 4
10 2
J 10
7
11    10
12
9
Q J 7 6 5 3
A 8 4
K Q 3

EW 3; NS 3; EW 3; NS 1N; NS 2; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−1503.500.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 5-Theis-Theis
4 E−1503.500.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 E31402.002.005-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
4 E44201.003.001-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Ling-Linde
5 ×S−25000.004.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
A Q 10 4 3
K
9 7 4
A K J 2
6 2
A 8 7 4
J 10 8 6 3
8 7
N
WE
S
J 8
Q J 10 3
A Q
10 6 5 4 3
17
5    10
8
K 9 7 5
9 6 5 2
K 5 2
Q 9

NS 5; NS 2N; EW 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N64804.000.005-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
2 N52001.502.501-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 N52001.502.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 5-Theis-Theis
2 N52001.502.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 N52001.502.504-Wainwright-Medic vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
3 2
8 6 5 4
K Q 10 7 6
K Q
A 6 4
K 10 9 3
A J 3
A 4 3
N
WE
S
J 10 9 8 5
Q J 2
9 2
10 8 2
10
16    4
10
K Q 7
A 7
8 5 4
J 9 7 6 5

EW 2; NS 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW−33004.000.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 5-Theis-Theis
3 S31103.001.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
2 W21102.002.001-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Ling-Linde
2 W31400.503.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
2 W31400.503.505-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Pumo-Pumo

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A J
A Q J 4 2
10 6
K 10 5 4
9 5 4 3
K 9 8 5
2
A Q 9 6
N
WE
S
Q 10 7 6 2
10 3
A Q 5 4 3
J
15
9    9
7
K 8
7 6
K J 9 8 7
8 7 3 2

EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTS31504.000.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 E−1502.002.001-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 W−1502.002.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
4 W−1502.002.005-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Theis-Theis
2 W21100.004.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Pumo-Pumo

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 3
8 3
8 4 3
K Q 8 7 3
A 7 4
J 10 7 6 5
7 2
6 4 2
N
WE
S
J 8 6 5
K 9 4 2
A K 10 6
A
10
5    15
10
10 9 2
A Q
Q J 9 5
J 10 9 5

EW 3; NS 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW−22004.000.001-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
4 N−21003.001.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 3-Ling-Linde
3 W31402.002.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
3 W41701.003.005-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Theis-Theis
4 ×N−23000.004.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
K J 8 3
10 6 2
K 9 7 2
9 4
10 5 4
A K Q J 9 4
J
A J 10
N
WE
S
A 9
Q 8 6 3
Q 8 7 6 5 3 2
7
16    8
9
Q 7 6 2
8 7 5 3
A 10 5 4
K

EW 6; EW 6; EW 4N; N 1; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E71904.000.001-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
3 W72602.501.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
2 W72602.501.503-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
4 W77100.503.504-Wainwright-Medic vs 3-Ling-Linde
5 W77100.503.505-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Theis-Theis

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
J 4
10 8 3
J 4 3
A K 10 8 6
Q 10 5 3 2
Q 6 4
A 10 2
Q 2
N
WE
S
6
A K J 9 2
9 7 6 5
5 4 3
9
10    8
13
A K 9 8 7
7 5
K Q 8
J 9 7

NS 2; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 1; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S21103.500.501-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
2 N31103.500.505-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Theis-Theis
1 NTN1902.002.002-Keslin-Goldstone vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
3 ×S−11001.003.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
4 S−31500.004.004-Wainwright-Medic vs 3-Ling-Linde

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
6 5 2
A K Q 5 4 2
J 9 6
A
K J 7
7
10 8 4
J 10 9 6 5 2
N
WE
S
A 8
9 6 3
A Q 7 5 3 2
4 3
14
5    10
11
Q 10 9 4 3
J 10 8
K
K Q 8 7

NS 3; NS 3; NS 2N; EW 3; EW 2; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N44203.500.502-Keslin-Goldstone vs 4-Peterson-Poznanski
4 N44203.500.505-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Theis-Theis
3 N31402.002.003-Shuman-Shuman vs 1-Pumo-Pumo
4 N−1500.503.501-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Hewitt-Linder
4 N−1500.503.504-Wainwright-Medic vs 3-Ling-Linde