Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24  
Thur Eve 199er Prs @ NVBA Evening Session September 18, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section EE  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   38.75   46.50  C                                               Diana Jarrett - Nancy Smagala
  2   41.25   49.50  C               1                      0.45(SC) Kathleen Parkins - Evelyn Reneer
  3   56.25   67.50  B   2     2           3     2          0.89(OB) Susan Gruskiewicz - Patricia Fitzgibbons
  4   61.25   73.50  B   1     1          1/2    1          1.33(OA) Patricia Greason - Rebecca Sekse
  5   52.92   63.50  A                                               Richard Poznanski - Asim Mandal
  6   49.58   59.50  B                                               James Connor - Debbie Moore

Thur Eve 199er Prs @ NVBA Evening Session September 18, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section EE  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   42.50   51.00  A                                               John Haberlin - Sandy Haberlin
  2   45.42   54.50  C                                               Phil Theis - Jeanne Theis
  3   50.00   60.00  A                                               James Hewitt - Kenneth Linder
  4   61.25   73.50  A   1                1/2               1.33(OA) John Holt - Joseph Drodge
  5   53.75   64.50  C   2     1     1     4     3          0.67(OB) Jovica Medic - Duncan Wainwright
  6   47.08   56.50  A                                               Alice Ling - Eleanor Linde

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠A 5
♥K 10 3
♦K 10 9
♣A 8 5 4 2
♠J 9 4
♥J 9 8 4
♦J 7 4
♣K 10 9
N
WE
S
♠K Q 8 6 2
♥A Q 7
♦8
♣Q 7 6 3
14
6    13
7
♠10 7 3
♥6 5 2
♦A Q 6 5 3 2
♣J

NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 3♦; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♠×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♦S41305.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 ♠×E−11004.001.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 ♠E−1503.002.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 ♠E1802.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde
5 ♦S−31501.004.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 ♦×S−23000.005.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠5
♥J 9 6 3
♦K 5 4 2
♣A J 9 4
♠K Q 8 7 4
♥K 7 2
♦10
♣Q 8 6 2
N
WE
S
♠A J 9 6
♥10 8 4
♦A Q 9 8
♣10 5
9
10    11
10
♠10 3 2
♥A Q 5
♦J 7 6 3
♣K 7 3

EW 3♠; EW 2N; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−21005.000.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
PassPass3.501.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
PassPass3.501.506-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 ♠W31402.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♠W41701.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 ♠W44200.005.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 10 7 5
♥A 9 5
♦8 5
♣Q 8 4 2
♠2
♥K J 7 6 3
♦K Q 9 4 2
♣J 7
N
WE
S
♠K Q 9 6 4 3
♥Q 8
♦A 7
♣A 10 5
7
10    15
8
♠A 8
♥10 4 2
♦J 10 6 3
♣K 9 6 3

EW 4♥; EW 3N; EW 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 1♣; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♠E−44005.000.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 NTE−22004.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♠E21102.502.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 ♠E21102.502.506-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 ♠E31400.504.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 ♠E31400.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠J 4 3
♥Q 8 7 5
♦J 4 3
♣Q J 3
♠Q 6 2
♥J 9 4
♦A Q 9 7 6
♣K 9
N
WE
S
♠K 7
♥6 3 2
♦K 8
♣10 8 7 6 5 4
7
12    6
15
♠A 10 9 8 5
♥A K 10
♦10 5 2
♣A 2

NS 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 1N; EW 1♦; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣E−22005.000.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 ♠S31404.001.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 ♠S21102.003.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 ♠S21102.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♠S21102.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge
2 ♦W2900.005.006-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠J 10 9
♥K 10 2
♦10 6 3
♣K 10 7 5
♠Q 8 7 6 4
♥J 8
♦A Q 9
♣9 8 3
N
WE
S
♠A K
♥A Q 9 7
♦K J 8 5 4
♣A 2
7
9    21
3
♠5 3 2
♥6 5 4 3
♦7 2
♣Q J 6 4

EW 7N; EW 7♠; EW 7♥; EW 7♦; EW 3♣; Par −1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE44305.000.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 ♠E64804.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 NTE64902.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTE64902.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTW64902.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 ♠E75100.005.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠A 10 4 2
♥—
♦J 8 7 3
♣Q 9 8 7 2
♠8 5
♥A Q 10 9 8 7 6 4
♦4
♣5 3
N
WE
S
♠K Q J 3
♥5
♦K Q 10 9 6 5
♣K 10
7
6    14
13
♠9 7 6
♥K J 3 2
♦A 2
♣A J 6 4

NS 4♣; NS 2N; NS 2♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥×W−38005.000.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 ♥W−33004.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 ♥W−22002.502.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 ♥W−22002.502.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 ♥W−11001.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 ♥W46200.005.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠A 3
♥A 2
♦A 10 7 4 3 2
♣J 10 8
♠Q J 10 6 5 4
♥7
♦9 5
♣Q 9 6 4
N
WE
S
♠K
♥Q 10 9 8 6 5
♦J 8
♣K 7 3 2
13
5    9
13
♠9 8 7 2
♥K J 4 3
♦K Q 6
♣A 5

NS 6♦; NS 5N; NS 2♥; S 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♦N56005.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 NTN52104.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 ♦N61703.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 ♦S51502.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 ♦S41301.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 ♦S−11000.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠A K 5 3 2
♥A K 9 8 6
♦A Q 3
♣—
♠Q J 9 7 6 4
♥—
♦K 10 5 2
♣J 9 6
N
WE
S
♠8
♥10 7 5 4 3 2
♦9 6 4
♣K Q 7
20
7    5
8
♠10
♥Q J
♦J 8 7
♣A 10 8 5 4 3 2

S 5♥; NS 4N; N 4♥; NS 2♠; S 3♦; NS 3♣; N 2♦; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥N54505.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTN34004.001.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♥N41703.002.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
5 ♣S−1502.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
6 NTN−21000.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
6 ♥N−21000.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠K 6
♥A K 8 6
♦4 2
♣J 10 9 6 2
♠9 7 4 2
♥Q 3
♦A K 8 3
♣A K 7
N
WE
S
♠A Q 3
♥10 9 4
♦Q 10 9 5
♣Q 4 3
11
16    10
3
♠J 10 8 5
♥J 7 5 2
♦J 7 6
♣8 5

EW 3N; EW 3♠; EW 4♦; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −500: NS 4♥×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTE31504.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 NTW31504.500.506-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTW36002.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTW36002.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTW36002.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTE46300.005.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠A 9 6 3
♥8 7 6
♦10 3
♣9 4 3 2
♠K 5 4 2
♥A K Q
♦Q 8 6
♣10 6 5
N
WE
S
♠Q 8
♥4 2
♦9 7 5 2
♣A Q J 8 7
4
14    9
13
♠J 10 7
♥J 10 9 5 3
♦A K J 4
♣K

EW 3N; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; NS 1♥; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 ♥S31405.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♥S21104.001.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 ♥S1803.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
1 ♥S−11002.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge
2 ♣E31101.004.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTW46300.005.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠A 6 5 2
♥J 6 4
♦9 8 5
♣9 6 2
♠Q J 10 8 7
♥7 5 3 2
♦J 3
♣Q 5
N
WE
S
♠9
♥K Q
♦A K 10 7 6
♣A K J 10 7
5
6    20
9
♠K 4 3
♥A 10 9 8
♦Q 4 2
♣8 4 3

EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 2N; EW 2♥; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−1505.000.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTE44304.001.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTE54601.503.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 NTE54601.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTE54601.503.504-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 NTE54601.503.506-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠4 3
♥K 10 6 3
♦10 6 4 2
♣J 6 3
♠A Q J 6 2
♥Q 7 5
♦7 3
♣9 5 4
N
WE
S
♠9 5
♥9 4
♦K Q J 8 5
♣A Q 8 2
4
9    12
15
♠K 10 8 7
♥A J 8 2
♦A 9
♣K 10 7

NS 3♥; NS 1N; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS1905.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 ♠W−1503.501.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 ♣E−1503.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 ♥S−11002.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♠W21100.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 ♠W21100.504.506-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠J 8 4
♥K 10 9 3
♦10 8
♣K 9 5 2
♠A K 7
♥J 8 2
♦A 9 7 6
♣Q 6 3
N
WE
S
♠10 6 3
♥Q 6 5 4
♦3 2
♣A 8 7 4
7
14    6
13
♠Q 9 5 2
♥A 7
♦K Q J 5 4
♣J 10

NS 2♠; NS 3♦; NS 1N; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣E−33005.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 NTN21203.501.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
1 NTN21203.501.506-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 ♦S2902.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 ♠S1801.004.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♦S−11000.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠9
♥A 6 3 2
♦10 5 4
♣A Q J 9 4
♠K Q 10 7 5 4 3
♥K 10 7
♦J 2
♣K
N
WE
S
♠J 8 6 2
♥4
♦A Q 9 8 7 3
♣7 6
11
12    7
10
♠A
♥Q J 9 8 5
♦K 6
♣10 8 5 3 2

NS 5♥; NS 5♣; EW 3♠; NS 2N; E 3♦; W 2♦; Par +300: EW 5♠×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♥S54505.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
4 ♠×W−11004.001.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 ♠W−1503.002.006-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 ♥S−1502.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 ♠W44200.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 ♠W44200.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠A J 8 4 3
♥Q 3
♦10
♣J 10 8 7 4
♠Q 6
♥A K 9 5 4
♦A Q 4 3
♣5 3
N
WE
S
♠K
♥J 7 6
♦K J 8 7 6 2
♣A Q 6
8
15    14
3
♠10 9 7 5 2
♥10 8 2
♦9 5
♣K 9 2

EW 6N; EW 6♥; EW 6♦; NS 2♠; NS 1♣; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥W−21005.000.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
5 ♦E54004.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 ♦E64203.002.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 ♥W54502.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 ♥W64800.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 ♥W64800.504.504-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠7 3
♥8 3
♦9 7 4
♣K 8 7 6 4 3
♠A 10 9 4
♥K 6 4
♦K J 5 3
♣5 2
N
WE
S
♠K Q J
♥A 9
♦A Q 10 8 2
♣A J 10
3
11    21
5
♠8 6 5 2
♥Q J 10 7 5 2
♦6
♣Q 9

EW 7♠; EW 6N; EW 6♦; EW 2♥; EW 3♣; Par −2210

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7 ♦W−11005.000.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTE66904.001.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTE77203.002.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde
6 NTE614401.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
6 NTE614401.503.504-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
6 NTE714700.005.006-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠Q
♥A J 10 9
♦A K 6
♣A Q J 7 5
♠9 7 5 3 2
♥Q 5 3
♦J 7
♣K 8 3
N
WE
S
♠K 10 8 4
♥8
♦10 8 5 4 2
♣9 4 2
21
6    3
10
♠A J 6
♥K 7 6 4 2
♦Q 9 3
♣10 6

NS 7N; NS 7♥; NS 7♣; NS 5♦; NS 3♠; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTN69905.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
6 ♥S69804.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 ♥S54502.003.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
4 ♥S54502.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
4 ♥N54502.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
5 ♣N74400.005.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠K 10 2
♥J 10 9 2
♦Q
♣K 8 7 3 2
♠J 9 7 6 4
♥5
♦K 9 8 7 2
♣A Q
N
WE
S
♠Q 3
♥A K 7
♦A J 5 3
♣10 6 5 4
9
10    14
7
♠A 8 5
♥Q 8 6 4 3
♦10 6 4
♣J 9

W 4♠; EW 3N; EW 5♦; E 3♠; NS 2♥; EW 1♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥S31405.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
5 ♦E−21003.501.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTE−21003.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 ♦E31102.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♦E41301.004.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTE44300.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠Q 6 3
♥A 10
♦A J 5 4
♣Q J 6 2
♠K 9 7
♥K J 7 4 3
♦Q 10 7 3
♣A
N
WE
S
♠A 10 5 4
♥Q 9 8 5
♦9 8 2
♣8 3
14
13    6
7
♠J 8 2
♥6 2
♦K 6
♣K 10 9 7 5 4

EW 2♥; NS 3♣; EW 1♠; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣S31105.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 ♣S−1503.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 ♣S−1503.501.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 ♥W31401.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 ♥W31401.004.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 ♥W31401.004.006-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠10 9 3
♥K 10 2
♦A K Q 8 3
♣7 5
♠J 8 6 5
♥Q 9
♦J 5 4 2
♣A 9 3
N
WE
S
♠Q
♥A J 8 5 4 3
♦9 6
♣K 10 4 2
12
8    10
10
♠A K 7 4 2
♥7 6
♦10 7
♣Q J 8 6

N 2N; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠S−11003.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 ♠S−11003.501.504-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge
2 ♠S−11003.501.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 ♠S−11003.501.506-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♦N−22001.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 ♠S−33000.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠A 4 3
♥K 9 6 4
♦10 5 2
♣10 6 5
♠7 6
♥Q 10 8 7 5
♦Q J 9 8
♣8 2
N
WE
S
♠K 8
♥3
♦A 7 6 4
♣K Q 9 7 4 3
7
5    12
16
♠Q J 10 9 5 2
♥A J 2
♦K 3
♣A J

NS 4♠; NS 3N; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♥; Par +300: EW 5♦×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS36005.000.006-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
5 ♣×E−23004.001.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 ♠S31403.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
1 NTS−11001.503.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 ♠S−11001.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 ♠S−22000.005.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠K 4 3
♥K J 8 7 5 2
♦J
♣Q J 10
♠10 8 2
♥A 9 4
♦8 3 2
♣K 9 7 5
N
WE
S
♠J 7 6
♥Q 6
♦A K 9 7 6 5
♣A 8
11
7    14
8
♠A Q 9 5
♥10 3
♦Q 10 4
♣6 4 3 2

NS 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♦; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♦E−22005.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 ♥N−1503.501.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♥N−1503.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 ♦E2902.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 ♠S−21000.504.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 ♥N−21000.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠Q 10 9 7 6 2
♥5
♦10 9 8 3
♣A K
♠A J
♥A K Q 4
♦6 5
♣10 9 7 6 3
N
WE
S
♠K 8 5
♥J 8 3
♦Q J 4 2
♣Q 8 5
9
14    9
8
♠4 3
♥10 9 7 6 2
♦A K 7
♣J 4 2

NS 3♠; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−33005.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 ♠N41704.001.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♠N21103.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 ♠N−11001.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 ♥S−11001.503.506-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 ♥W21100.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠10 7 4 2
♥Q 10 9 3 2
♦7 5
♣J 4
♠K 9 6 3
♥K 8 4
♦—
♣K 10 9 8 5 2
N
WE
S
♠—
♥J 7 6
♦Q J 10 9 6 4 3 2
♣6 3
3
9    4
24
♠A Q J 8 5
♥A 5
♦A K 8
♣A Q 7

S 5N; S 5♠; N 4♠; N 3N; EW 2♦; NS 1♥; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠×S45905.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 ♠S54504.001.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTS44302.502.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 NTS44302.502.506-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 ♠S44201.004.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge
6 NTS−21000.005.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright