Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24  
Thur Eve 199er Prs @ NVBA Evening Session September 18, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section EE  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   38.75   46.50  C                                               Diana Jarrett - Nancy Smagala
  2   41.25   49.50  C               1                      0.45(SC) Kathleen Parkins - Evelyn Reneer
  3   56.25   67.50  B   2     2           3     2          0.89(OB) Susan Gruskiewicz - Patricia Fitzgibbons
  4   61.25   73.50  B   1     1          1/2    1          1.33(OA) Patricia Greason - Rebecca Sekse
  5   52.92   63.50  A                                               Richard Poznanski - Asim Mandal
  6   49.58   59.50  B                                               James Connor - Debbie Moore

Thur Eve 199er Prs @ NVBA Evening Session September 18, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section EE  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  1   42.50   51.00  A                                               John Haberlin - Sandy Haberlin
  2   45.42   54.50  C                                               Phil Theis - Jeanne Theis
  3   50.00   60.00  A                                               James Hewitt - Kenneth Linder
  4   61.25   73.50  A   1                1/2               1.33(OA) John Holt - Joseph Drodge
  5   53.75   64.50  C   2     1     1     4     3          0.67(OB) Jovica Medic - Duncan Wainwright
  6   47.08   56.50  A                                               Alice Ling - Eleanor Linde

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A 5
K 10 3
K 10 9
A 8 5 4 2
J 9 4
J 9 8 4
J 7 4
K 10 9
N
WE
S
K Q 8 6 2
A Q 7
8
Q 7 6 3
14
6    13
7
10 7 3
6 5 2
A Q 6 5 3 2
J

NS 2N; EW 2; NS 3; EW 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S41305.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 ×E−11004.001.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 E−1503.002.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 E1802.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde
5 S−31501.004.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 ×S−23000.005.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
5
J 9 6 3
K 5 4 2
A J 9 4
K Q 8 7 4
K 7 2
10
Q 8 6 2
N
WE
S
A J 9 6
10 8 4
A Q 9 8
10 5
9
10    11
10
10 3 2
A Q 5
J 7 6 3
K 7 3

EW 3; EW 2N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21005.000.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
PassPass3.501.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
PassPass3.501.506-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 W31402.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 W41701.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 W44200.005.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
J 10 7 5
A 9 5
8 5
Q 8 4 2
2
K J 7 6 3
K Q 9 4 2
J 7
N
WE
S
K Q 9 6 4 3
Q 8
A 7
A 10 5
7
10    15
8
A 8
10 4 2
J 10 6 3
K 9 6 3

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 4; EW 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−44005.000.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 NTE−22004.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 E21102.502.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 E21102.502.506-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 E31400.504.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 E31400.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
J 4 3
Q 8 7 5
J 4 3
Q J 3
Q 6 2
J 9 4
A Q 9 7 6
K 9
N
WE
S
K 7
6 3 2
K 8
10 8 7 6 5 4
7
12    6
15
A 10 9 8 5
A K 10
10 5 2
A 2

NS 2; NS 2; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−22005.000.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 S31404.001.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 S21102.003.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 S21102.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 S21102.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 4-Holt-Drodge
2 W2900.005.006-Connor-Moore vs 6-Ling-Linde

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 10 9
K 10 2
10 6 3
K 10 7 5
Q 8 7 6 4
J 8
A Q 9
9 8 3
N
WE
S
A K
A Q 9 7
K J 8 5 4
A 2
7
9    21
3
5 3 2
6 5 4 3
7 2
Q J 6 4

EW 7N; EW 7; EW 7; EW 7; EW 3; Par −1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE44305.000.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 E64804.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 NTE64902.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTE64902.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTW64902.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 E75100.005.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 10 4 2
J 8 7 3
Q 9 8 7 2
8 5
A Q 10 9 8 7 6 4
4
5 3
N
WE
S
K Q J 3
5
K Q 10 9 6 5
K 10
7
6    14
13
9 7 6
K J 3 2
A 2
A J 6 4

NS 4; NS 2N; NS 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×W−38005.000.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 W−33004.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 W−22002.502.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 W−22002.502.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 W−11001.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 W46200.005.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A 3
A 2
A 10 7 4 3 2
J 10 8
Q J 10 6 5 4
7
9 5
Q 9 6 4
N
WE
S
K
Q 10 9 8 6 5
J 8
K 7 3 2
13
5    9
13
9 8 7 2
K J 4 3
K Q 6
A 5

NS 6; NS 5N; NS 2; S 1; EW 1; Par +1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 N56005.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 NTN52104.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 N61703.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 S51502.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 S41301.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 S−11000.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A K 5 3 2
A K 9 8 6
A Q 3
Q J 9 7 6 4
K 10 5 2
J 9 6
N
WE
S
8
10 7 5 4 3 2
9 6 4
K Q 7
20
7    5
8
10
Q J
J 8 7
A 10 8 5 4 3 2

S 5; NS 4N; N 4; NS 2; S 3; NS 3; N 2; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54505.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTN34004.001.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 N41703.002.006-Connor-Moore vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
5 S−1502.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Holt-Drodge
6 NTN−21000.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 6-Ling-Linde
6 N−21000.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 3-Hewitt-Linder

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
K 6
A K 8 6
4 2
J 10 9 6 2
9 7 4 2
Q 3
A K 8 3
A K 7
N
WE
S
A Q 3
10 9 4
Q 10 9 5
Q 4 3
11
16    10
3
J 10 8 5
J 7 5 2
J 7 6
8 5

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 4; NS 1; EW 1; Par −500: NS 4×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTE31504.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 NTW31504.500.506-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTW36002.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTW36002.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTW36002.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTE46300.005.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 9 6 3
8 7 6
10 3
9 4 3 2
K 5 4 2
A K Q
Q 8 6
10 6 5
N
WE
S
Q 8
4 2
9 7 5 2
A Q J 8 7
4
14    9
13
J 10 7
J 10 9 5 3
A K J 4
K

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 3; NS 1; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 S31405.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 S21104.001.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 S1803.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
1 S−11002.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge
2 E31101.004.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTW46300.005.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
A 6 5 2
J 6 4
9 8 5
9 6 2
Q J 10 8 7
7 5 3 2
J 3
Q 5
N
WE
S
9
K Q
A K 10 7 6
A K J 10 7
5
6    20
9
K 4 3
A 10 9 8
Q 4 2
8 4 3

EW 5; EW 3; EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−1505.000.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTE44304.001.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTE54601.503.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 NTE54601.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTE54601.503.504-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 NTE54601.503.506-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
4 3
K 10 6 3
10 6 4 2
J 6 3
A Q J 6 2
Q 7 5
7 3
9 5 4
N
WE
S
9 5
9 4
K Q J 8 5
A Q 8 2
4
9    12
15
K 10 8 7
A J 8 2
A 9
K 10 7

NS 3; NS 1N; EW 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS1905.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 W−1503.501.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 E−1503.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 S−11002.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 W21100.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 W21100.504.506-Connor-Moore vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
J 8 4
K 10 9 3
10 8
K 9 5 2
A K 7
J 8 2
A 9 7 6
Q 6 3
N
WE
S
10 6 3
Q 6 5 4
3 2
A 8 7 4
7
14    6
13
Q 9 5 2
A 7
K Q J 5 4
J 10

NS 2; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−33005.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 NTN21203.501.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
1 NTN21203.501.506-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 S2902.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 S1801.004.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 S−11000.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
9
A 6 3 2
10 5 4
A Q J 9 4
K Q 10 7 5 4 3
K 10 7
J 2
K
N
WE
S
J 8 6 2
4
A Q 9 8 7 3
7 6
11
12    7
10
A
Q J 9 8 5
K 6
10 8 5 3 2

NS 5; NS 5; EW 3; NS 2N; E 3; W 2; Par +300: EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S54505.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
4 ×W−11004.001.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 W−1503.002.006-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 S−1502.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 W44200.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 W44200.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A J 8 4 3
Q 3
10
J 10 8 7 4
Q 6
A K 9 5 4
A Q 4 3
5 3
N
WE
S
K
J 7 6
K J 8 7 6 2
A Q 6
8
15    14
3
10 9 7 5 2
10 8 2
9 5
K 9 2

EW 6N; EW 6; EW 6; NS 2; NS 1; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21005.000.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
5 E54004.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 E64203.002.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 W54502.003.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 W64800.504.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 W64800.504.504-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
7 3
8 3
9 7 4
K 8 7 6 4 3
A 10 9 4
K 6 4
K J 5 3
5 2
N
WE
S
K Q J
A 9
A Q 10 8 2
A J 10
3
11    21
5
8 6 5 2
Q J 10 7 5 2
6
Q 9

EW 7; EW 6N; EW 6; EW 2; EW 3; Par −2210

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7 W−11005.000.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTE66904.001.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTE77203.002.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 6-Ling-Linde
6 NTE614401.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Theis-Theis
6 NTE614401.503.504-Greason-Sekse vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
6 NTE714700.005.006-Connor-Moore vs 3-Hewitt-Linder

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
Q
A J 10 9
A K 6
A Q J 7 5
9 7 5 3 2
Q 5 3
J 7
K 8 3
N
WE
S
K 10 8 4
8
10 8 5 4 2
9 4 2
21
6    3
10
A J 6
K 7 6 4 2
Q 9 3
10 6

NS 7N; NS 7; NS 7; NS 5; NS 3; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTN69905.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
6 S69804.001.006-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 S54502.003.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
4 S54502.003.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
4 N54502.003.003-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
5 N74400.005.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 10 2
J 10 9 2
Q
K 8 7 3 2
J 9 7 6 4
5
K 9 8 7 2
A Q
N
WE
S
Q 3
A K 7
A J 5 3
10 6 5 4
9
10    14
7
A 8 5
Q 8 6 4 3
10 6 4
J 9

W 4; EW 3N; EW 5; E 3; NS 2; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31405.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
5 E−21003.501.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 NTE−21003.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 E31102.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 E41301.004.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 NTE44300.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q 6 3
A 10
A J 5 4
Q J 6 2
K 9 7
K J 7 4 3
Q 10 7 3
A
N
WE
S
A 10 5 4
Q 9 8 5
9 8 2
8 3
14
13    6
7
J 8 2
6 2
K 6
K 10 9 7 5 4

EW 2; NS 3; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31105.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 S−1503.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 S−1503.501.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 W31401.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 W31401.004.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 W31401.004.006-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
10 9 3
K 10 2
A K Q 8 3
7 5
J 8 6 5
Q 9
J 5 4 2
A 9 3
N
WE
S
Q
A J 8 5 4 3
9 6
K 10 4 2
12
8    10
10
A K 7 4 2
7 6
10 7
Q J 8 6

N 2N; EW 2; NS 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S−11003.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 S−11003.501.504-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Holt-Drodge
2 S−11003.501.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 S−11003.501.506-Connor-Moore vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 N−22001.004.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 S−33000.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A 4 3
K 9 6 4
10 5 2
10 6 5
7 6
Q 10 8 7 5
Q J 9 8
8 2
N
WE
S
K 8
3
A 7 6 4
K Q 9 7 4 3
7
5    12
16
Q J 10 9 5 2
A J 2
K 3
A J

NS 4; NS 3N; EW 3; EW 2; NS 1; Par +300: EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS36005.000.006-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
5 ×E−23004.001.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
3 S31403.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
1 NTS−11001.503.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge
4 S−11001.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
4 S−22000.005.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
K 4 3
K J 8 7 5 2
J
Q J 10
10 8 2
A 9 4
8 3 2
K 9 7 5
N
WE
S
J 7 6
Q 6
A K 9 7 6 5
A 8
11
7    14
8
A Q 9 5
10 3
Q 10 4
6 4 3 2

NS 2; EW 1N; EW 2; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−22005.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
3 N−1503.501.501-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 N−1503.501.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 E2902.003.006-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 S−21000.504.502-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge
3 N−21000.504.505-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
Q 10 9 7 6 2
5
10 9 8 3
A K
A J
A K Q 4
6 5
10 9 7 6 3
N
WE
S
K 8 5
J 8 3
Q J 4 2
Q 8 5
9
14    9
8
4 3
10 9 7 6 2
A K 7
J 4 2

NS 3; EW 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−33005.000.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright
2 N41704.001.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 N21103.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
2 N−11001.503.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
2 S−11001.503.506-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
1 W21100.005.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
10 7 4 2
Q 10 9 3 2
7 5
J 4
K 9 6 3
K 8 4
K 10 9 8 5 2
N
WE
S
J 7 6
Q J 10 9 6 4 3 2
6 3
3
9    4
24
A Q J 8 5
A 5
A K 8
A Q 7

S 5N; S 5; N 4; N 3N; EW 2; NS 1; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×S45905.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Hewitt-Linder
5 S54504.001.001-Jarrett-Smagala vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTS44302.502.503-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Ling-Linde
3 NTS44302.502.506-Connor-Moore vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 S44201.004.002-Parkins-Reneer vs 4-Holt-Drodge
6 NTS−21000.005.005-Poznanski-Mandal vs 5-Medic-Wainwright