Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  
199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session July 10, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section E  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   43.33   52.00  B                             Joanne Domson - Ruth Ann Verell
  2   52.92   63.50  C   3                0.25(A)  Philip Theis - Jeanne Theis
  3   46.67   56.00  B                             Cordellia Scruggs - Arlene Schettler
  4   44.17   53.00  C                             Betsy Deering - June Gladding
  5   39.17   47.00  A                             Richard Long - Carol Goldstone
  6   56.25   67.50  B   2     2          0.34(A)  Sue Gruskiewicz - Pat Fitzgibbons
  7   67.50   81.00  C   1     1     1    0.49(A)  Gordon Soper - William Lowry

199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session July 10, 2014
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section E  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   57.08   68.50  A   2                0.34(A)  John Haberlin - Sandy Haberlin
  2   46.25   55.50  B                             Nancy Tarlano - Rozelin Prochaska
  3   61.25   73.50  C   1     1     1    0.49(A)  John Peterson - Richard Poznanski
  4   28.33   34.00  C                             Joan Flippin - Betty Quirk
  5   55.00   66.00  A   3                0.25(A)  Kenneth Linder - James Hewitt
  6   48.33   58.00  A                             Walt Pumo - Janice Pumo
  7   53.75   64.50  C         2          0.17(B)  Duncan Wainwright - Jovica Medic

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A 6 2
A 8
K 3 2
J 9 6 5 2
Q 3
10 7 3 2
J 10 8 4
A K Q
N
WE
S
J 10 8 5 4
Q J 6 5
7 6
10 8
12
12    4
12
K 9 7
K 9 4
A Q 9 5
7 4 3

NS 2N; NS 3; NS 3; NS 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS34004.500.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 NTN34004.500.506-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
1 W−31503.002.007-Soper-Lowry vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
3 N41302.003.004-Deering-Gladding vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
2 N31101.004.001-Domson-Verell vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 NTN−1500.005.005-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
10 7 4 2
8 7
J 8 4 2
5 4 2
5 3
J 10 5 4 3 2
K 7 3
9 3
N
WE
S
J 9 6
K 6
A Q 9 6
K 10 8 6
1
4    13
22
A K Q 8
A Q 9
10 5
A Q J 7

NS 3; NS 2N; E 2; NS 2; W 1; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31405.000.004-Deering-Gladding vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
3 W−21004.001.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
2 S2903.002.001-Domson-Verell vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 W−1502.003.007-Soper-Lowry vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
4 N−11001.004.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 S−33000.005.005-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
10
10
A K J 9 6 5 4
A Q J 9
A K Q 6 3
A K J 4
8 7 2
10
N
WE
S
9 7 4
9 8 7 5 3
10
K 8 5 3
15
17    3
5
J 8 5 2
Q 6 2
Q 3
7 6 4 2

EW 4; EW 4; NS 4; S 2N; S 2; N 1; Par −100: NS 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N41304.500.506-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 N41304.500.507-Soper-Lowry vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
5 W−11003.002.004-Deering-Gladding vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
5 N−1502.003.001-Domson-Verell vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
5 ×N−11001.004.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
4 W46200.005.005-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A K 10 7 6 5
10 9
A K 6 5 4
J 9 4
J 6 5 2
5
Q J 9 7 2
N
WE
S
8
A Q 9 7 3
8 6 4 3 2
8 3
14
5    6
15
Q 3 2
K 10 8 4
A K Q J 7
10

NS 7; NS 7; NS 6N; N 4; S 3; NS 1; Par +2210

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 N714604.500.506-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
6 N714604.500.507-Soper-Lowry vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
4 N77102.003.001-Domson-Verell vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 N77102.003.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
4 N77102.003.005-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
4 N66800.005.004-Deering-Gladding vs 7-Wainwright-Medic

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 10 7 3
9 6
K 9 4 3
A J 10
A K 9 8 4
A 5
A J 10 8
8 6
N
WE
S
6 5
10 8
Q 7 2
Q 9 7 5 4 3
9
16    4
11
Q 2
K Q J 7 4 3 2
6 5
K 2

NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31404.500.502-Theis-Theis vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 S31404.500.505-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 W−21003.002.001-Domson-Verell vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
2 W−1502.003.004-Deering-Gladding vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
3 S−11001.004.007-Soper-Lowry vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
4 ×S−12000.005.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
5 3 2
A 9 8 4 2
A Q 5 4 2
10 7 6
A J 9 7 6 4
K
K J 7
N
WE
S
A Q 9 4 3 2
Q
J 10 6 5 3
8
10
12    9
9
K J 8 5
K 10 8
Q 7
10 9 6 3

EW 3; S 2N; W 2; S 3; N 1N; N 2; E 1; NS 1; Par −100: S 3N×−1; S 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×E−25005.000.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 E−11004.001.001-Domson-Verell vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
4 N−21003.002.002-Theis-Theis vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 E31401.503.504-Deering-Gladding vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
3 E31401.503.507-Soper-Lowry vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 N−31500.005.005-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
Q 10 3
Q 10 5
8 3
K J 5 4 3
K 9 8 7
J 8 7 2
J 9 7
A 2
N
WE
S
2
A 9 6 3
A Q 10 6
10 8 7 6
8
9    10
13
A J 6 5 4
K 4
K 5 4 2
Q 9

NS 2; EW 2; NS 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−22005.000.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
2 S21103.002.002-Theis-Theis vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 S21103.002.004-Deering-Gladding vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
2 S21103.002.007-Soper-Lowry vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 W−11001.004.001-Domson-Verell vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
2 S−11000.005.005-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A 7 4
A K 7 6 3
Q 9 3
J 8
K Q 6 3
J 5 2
10 8 7
6 4 3
N
WE
S
J 9 2
8 4
K J 4 2
K Q 10 7
14
6    10
10
10 8 5
Q 10 9
A 6 5
A 9 5 2

N 3N; NS 3; S 2N; NS 1; NS 1; N 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34005.000.005-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 N31404.001.007-Soper-Lowry vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
2 N21103.002.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 N−1501.004.001-Domson-Verell vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
3 N−1501.004.002-Theis-Theis vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
3 N−1501.004.004-Deering-Gladding vs 6-Pumo-Pumo

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
7
K 7
K 9 7 6 4
7 6 5 3 2
A 8 5
Q 9 8
A 10
A Q J 10 9
N
WE
S
Q 10 4 2
10 5
Q 8 5 3 2
8 4
6
17    4
13
K J 9 6 3
A J 6 4 3 2
J
K

EW 2N; NS 2; EW 3; EW 2; EW 1; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S52005.000.001-Domson-Verell vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
3 S31403.501.502-Theis-Theis vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 S31403.501.507-Soper-Lowry vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 S−1501.503.505-Long-Goldstone vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
2 S−1501.503.506-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
1 NTW31500.005.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
10 3
K 9 8 3
8 7 6
K 10 4 2
8 4
J 7 4
9 5 3
A Q 9 8 3
N
WE
S
A K 6 5
10 6 5 2
J 4 2
J 6
6
7    9
18
Q J 9 7 2
A Q
A K Q 10
7 5

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46205.000.007-Soper-Lowry vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 NTN36003.501.501-Domson-Verell vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTN36003.501.502-Theis-Theis vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 S41702.003.005-Long-Goldstone vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
1 S31401.004.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 S41300.005.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
6 5 2
Q 8 6 2
J
A J 9 6 4
Q 8 7 4 3
5
9 3 2
K 10 8 2
N
WE
S
10
A K 10 9 4
K 10 7 4
Q 7 3
8
5    12
15
A K J 9
J 7 3
A Q 8 6 5
5

NS 2; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 S21104.500.506-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 S21104.500.507-Soper-Lowry vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
2 W−21003.002.005-Long-Goldstone vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
2 S−1502.003.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTN−21000.504.501-Domson-Verell vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
2 NTN−21000.504.502-Theis-Theis vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A 9 4 2
10 6 3
A 10 2
Q 4 3
5 3
A 8 7
J 8 6 5 3
A J 6
N
WE
S
J 10 8 7
K J 9
Q 9 7
8 7 2
10
10    7
13
K Q 6
Q 5 4 2
K 4
K 10 9 5

NS 2N; NS 2; NS 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N31404.500.506-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 N31404.500.507-Soper-Lowry vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
2 N21103.002.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
2 N−11001.503.501-Domson-Verell vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
2 NTS−11001.503.502-Theis-Theis vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 N−22000.005.005-Long-Goldstone vs 7-Wainwright-Medic

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A K 10 5
A 3
K J 6 5 4
8 5
J 9 8 4 3 2
K 5 4
A
K 9 6
N
WE
S
Q 7
Q J 8
Q 10 8 7
J 10 4 2
15
11    8
6
6
10 9 7 6 2
9 3 2
A Q 7 3

NS 2; NS 3; EW 1N; EW 1; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N31405.000.004-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 N31104.001.007-Soper-Lowry vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 W−11003.002.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 N2902.003.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 N−22000.504.501-Domson-Verell vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 N−22000.504.502-Theis-Theis vs 7-Wainwright-Medic

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K Q 7 6
J 9 7 2
A K 7 2
2
10 2
8 6
10 9 3
A Q J 10 8 5
N
WE
S
J 8 5 4
K 10 4 3
Q J 8 5
6
13
7    7
13
A 9 3
A Q 5
6 4
K 9 7 4 3

S 4; NS 3N; N 3; NS 3; NS 3; NS 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N44205.000.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 NTN21204.001.007-Soper-Lowry vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
2 N21103.002.001-Domson-Verell vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
2 N−1501.503.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
3 NTS−1501.503.504-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 NTN−21000.005.002-Theis-Theis vs 7-Wainwright-Medic

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
K 4 2
10 2
A J 6 5
A K 7 2
A 6 3
A Q 6 5
K 7 4 2
9 4
N
WE
S
9 7
K 9 7
Q 10 8 3
10 8 6 3
15
13    5
7
Q J 10 8 5
J 8 4 3
9
Q J 5

NS 3; NS 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S41705.000.002-Theis-Theis vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
2 N31403.501.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 S31403.501.507-Soper-Lowry vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 W−1501.503.501-Domson-Verell vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
1 W−1501.503.504-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
2 W31100.005.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
9 5 4 2
9 7
K J 8 5 2
9 7
A Q 8
K J 10 8 6
9 7
Q J 3
N
WE
S
J 10 7 3
Q 4
Q 10
K 8 5 4 2
4
13    8
15
K 6
A 5 3 2
A 6 4 3
A 10 6

EW 2; EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTE−11003.002.001-Domson-Verell vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
2 E−11003.002.002-Theis-Theis vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
1 NTE−11003.002.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
1 NTE−11003.002.004-Deering-Gladding vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
1 NTE−11003.002.007-Soper-Lowry vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
2 E31400.005.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
J 5 4 2
J 6 5 4 3 2
Q 9
8
10 9 3
9 7
A J 6 2
K 10 5 2
N
WE
S
A K 8 6
K Q
10 8 7 3
A 9 3
4
8    16
12
Q 7
A 10 8
K 5 4
Q J 7 6 4

EW 2; NS 2; EW 3; EW 1N; EW 2; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−21005.000.007-Soper-Lowry vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
4 W−1504.001.001-Domson-Verell vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
2 NTE21203.002.004-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
2 NTE41801.503.502-Theis-Theis vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
2 NTE41801.503.505-Long-Goldstone vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 NTE34000.005.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K J 10 7 5 4 2
K 7
J
9 7 2
A 9 6
3 2
10 8 6 4 2
K 8 4
N
WE
S
8
A 9 8 6
K Q 9 7 5
Q 5 3
8
7    11
14
Q 3
Q J 10 5 4
A 3
A J 10 6

NS 4; EW 3; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; Par +300: EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56504.500.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 N56504.500.507-Soper-Lowry vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 N52002.003.001-Domson-Verell vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 N52002.003.002-Theis-Theis vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
3 N52002.003.005-Long-Goldstone vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
4 E41300.005.004-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
6
5 4 3 2
Q 6
A K J 8 7 5
K 9 5 4
A K Q J 10 6
K 10
2
N
WE
S
10 8 3 2
8 7
A 8 5 4 3
10 4
10
16    4
10
A Q J 7
9
J 9 7 2
Q 9 6 3

EW 3; NS 4; EW 2; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N51505.000.005-Long-Goldstone vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
4 N41303.002.001-Domson-Verell vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
4 N41303.002.002-Theis-Theis vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
4 N41303.002.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
2 W21101.004.007-Soper-Lowry vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
5 ×N−23000.005.004-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
K 10 7 5
A K Q J 7
2
9 6 3
8 6 4
A J 7 6 5 4 3
Q J 10
N
WE
S
3
9 8 5 4 3
Q 10 9
A 7 5 4
13
8    6
13
A Q J 9 2
10 6 2
K 8
K 8 2

S 4; NS 4; EW 5; N 3; Par −200: NS 5×−1; S 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56504.500.501-Domson-Verell vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
4 S56504.500.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
4 N46202.502.502-Theis-Theis vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
4 N46202.502.507-Soper-Lowry vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
2 N52001.004.005-Long-Goldstone vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 W31100.005.004-Deering-Gladding vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K J 7 3
K 10 7 5 3
10 7
10 9
6 5
J 4
A K J 9
A 8 4 3 2
N
WE
S
Q 9 4
Q 8 6 2
Q 4 2
Q J 7
7
13    9
11
A 10 8 2
A 9
8 6 5 3
K 6 5

NS 2; EW 3; EW 1N; EW 2; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−31505.000.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
2 S21104.001.002-Theis-Theis vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
1 E1803.002.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
3 W31102.003.004-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
1 NTE21200.504.501-Domson-Verell vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
1 NTW21200.504.505-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Flippin-Quirk

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
8 3
K J 9
A 10 8 6 4
7 6 4
A 7 2
Q 6 5
9 3
10 8 5 3 2
N
WE
S
K Q 6 5 4
A 8 3
K J
Q J 9
8
6    16
10
J 10 9
10 7 4 2
Q 7 5 2
A K

EW 2; NS 3; EW 1N; EW 2; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−11005.000.004-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
1 NTE1903.501.502-Theis-Theis vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
1 NTE1903.501.506-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
1 NTE21202.003.005-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 E41700.504.501-Domson-Verell vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 E41700.504.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 7-Wainwright-Medic

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
9 7 6 5 2
Q
K 6 3 2
J 4 2
K Q J 10
9 8 7 4
A 9 4
A K
N
WE
S
A 3
K J 10 6 3
8 5
Q 8 6 3
6
17    10
7
8 4
A 5 2
Q J 10 7
10 9 7 5

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 3; EW 1; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 W31405.000.004-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
4 W46204.001.005-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
4 W66802.003.002-Theis-Theis vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
4 W66802.003.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
4 W66802.003.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTW66900.005.001-Domson-Verell vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
J 4
J 2
K Q 6 5 3 2
A 5 2
10 9 6 5 3 2
A 9
A 10 4
K J
N
WE
S
A 8
K Q 10 3
J 9
Q 8 7 6 4
11
12    12
5
K Q 7
8 7 6 5 4
8 7
10 9 3

W 4N; E 3N; EW 3; EW 4; EW 2; W 1; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21005.000.005-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
4 W−1503.501.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
4 W−1503.501.504-Deering-Gladding vs 2-Tarlano-Prochaska
3 E41302.003.001-Domson-Verell vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 W31401.004.002-Theis-Theis vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 NTW54600.005.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 6-Pumo-Pumo

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
10 9 5 3 2
A 3 2
10 7 5
6 3
A J 8 6 4
Q 7
3 2
K J 10 5
N
WE
S
K Q
K 5 4
A K J 9 8 6 4
9
4
11    16
9
7
J 10 9 8 6
Q
A Q 8 7 4 2

EW 5N; EW 4; EW 5; EW 1; NS 1; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×W−12005.000.002-Theis-Theis vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
3 E51503.501.504-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 E51503.501.507-Soper-Lowry vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
4 E61702.003.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
5 E66201.004.005-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
3 NTW46300.005.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 6-Pumo-Pumo

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
K 10 7 3
J 10 3
K 8 7 6
A 8
9 6 4 2
8
J 10 5 4 3
Q 10 9
N
WE
S
A Q 8 5
9 7 5 4
Q
J 6 3 2
11
3    9
17
J
A K Q 6 2
A 9 2
K 7 5 4

NS 5; NS 4N; NS 4; NS 3; NS 1; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46203.002.002-Theis-Theis vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
4 S46203.002.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
4 S46203.002.005-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 S46203.002.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
4 S46203.002.007-Soper-Lowry vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
4 S−11000.005.004-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
J 8 5 2
5
A K 10 8 6
J 9 8
9
A 8 7 4
Q J 5 4 3
A 10 6
N
WE
S
Q 6
K J 10 9 3 2
7 2
Q 5 2
9
11    8
12
A K 10 7 4 3
Q 6
9
K 7 4 3

NS 4; EW 3; NS 3; NS 1; Par +300: EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S54505.000.003-Scruggs-Schettler vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
4 S44203.002.002-Theis-Theis vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
4 S44203.002.005-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 S44203.002.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Linder-Hewitt
3 S52001.004.007-Soper-Lowry vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
5 E−31500.005.004-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
Q 7
J 10 7
A J 4 3
A 10 9 4
A K J 6 4
A K Q 2
10
K 6 5
N
WE
S
8 3 2
8 5
Q 9 8 6 5
J 7 2
12
20    3
5
10 9 5
9 6 4 3
K 7 2
Q 8 3

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 3; EW 2; EW 2; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21005.000.007-Soper-Lowry vs 7-Wainwright-Medic
4 E−1504.001.002-Theis-Theis vs 4-Flippin-Quirk
1 W21102.502.503-Scruggs-Schettler vs 6-Pumo-Pumo
1 W21102.502.504-Deering-Gladding vs 1-Haberlin-Haberlin
3 W31401.004.005-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Peterson-Poznanski
4 W44200.005.006-Gruskiewicz-Fitzgibbons vs 5-Linder-Hewitt