Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  
A/X Pairs Thursday Eve Session May 15, 2014
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score    Sectn Rank  O/All Rank    MPs
                         A     X     A     X
  1   54.46   91.50  A   3                      0.64(SA) David Fleischer - Charles Yaple
  2   46.73   78.50  X                                   George Parkins - Paul Block
  3   59.23   99.50  A   1           2          3.83(OA) Barry Falgout - Rusty Krauss
  4   55.95   94.00  X   2     1     4     1    2.15(OA) Rick Bingham - Daniel Feldman
  5   47.32   79.50  X                     4    0.81(OX) Thomas Musso - Kathrine Loh
  6   48.81   82.00  X         2           3    1.07(OX) Luther Hampton - Michael Hampton
  7   48.81   82.00  A                                   Robert Boyd - Ronald Kral
  8   38.69   65.00  X                                   Michael Lawrence - Craig Olson

A/X Pairs Thursday Eve Session May 15, 2014
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score    Sectn Rank  O/All Rank    MPs
                         A     X     A     X
  1   48.81   82.00  A                                   Jim Wakefield - Helene Bauman
  2   41.96   70.50  X                                   James Gerding - W Karl Van Newkirk
  3   59.82  100.50  A   1           1          5.10(OA) Mark Tonnesen - Kenneth Davis
  4   51.49   86.50  X         1           2    1.43(OX) Leo Cardillo - Jim Dick
  5   56.25   94.50  A   2           3          2.87(OA) Terry Lavender - Thomas Lavender
  6   42.56   71.50  X                                   Jim Bridges - Amanda Carter
  7   55.65   93.50  A   3           5          1.61(OA) Sumner Steinfeldt - Vonnie Lavender
  8   43.45   73.00  X         2                0.62(SX) Clifford Feldman - Tom Jennings

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
K Q 5 2
4 2
9 8 7 4
A 7 3
10 7 6
10 5
A Q J 5 2
J 10 6
N
WE
S
A 3
K 9 8 6 3
K 3
K 9 8 4
9
8    13
10
J 9 8 4
A Q J 7
10 6
Q 5 2

NS 3; E 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−21005.001.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
2 E−21005.001.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
2 E−21005.001.005-Musso-Loh vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
2 E−1502.004.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 6-Bridges-Carter
2 E−1502.004.007-Boyd-Kral vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
2 E−1502.004.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
2 E31400.006.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
4
A K Q 10 9 8 3
A 3
A J 4
J 6
4
K Q J 10 5 4
Q 7 6 3
N
WE
S
A K 10 9 5
J 6 2
7 6
K 10 9
18
9    11
2
Q 8 7 3 2
7 5
9 8 2
8 5 2

NS 3N; NS 3; EW 4; EW 2; EW 2; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×E−35006.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 N41705.001.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 6-Bridges-Carter
5 ×W−11004.002.005-Musso-Loh vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
5 W−1503.003.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 N−11001.504.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 N−11001.504.507-Boyd-Kral vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 ×N−12000.006.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 10 6
A Q
A 10 8 7
J 8 6
A 9 4 2
8
Q 6 3
A Q 5 4 2
N
WE
S
K 8 7 5 3
J 10 9
J 5
K 10 9
14
12    8
6
K 7 6 5 4 3 2
K 9 4 2
7 3

NS 4; EW 2; NS 3; EW 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×S67906.000.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 6-Bridges-Carter
4 ×E−25004.501.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 ×E−25004.501.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
4 S44203.003.007-Boyd-Kral vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
5 W−33002.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 S52001.005.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 NTN−21000.006.005-Musso-Loh vs 8-Feldman-Jennings

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
Q 9 6
4
J 9 7 5 3 2
K 10 2
7
Q 9 7 6 3 2
Q 10 8 4
A 3
N
WE
S
A 8 5 4 3 2
A K J 8
7 5 4
6
8    12
14
K J 10
10 5
A K 6
Q J 9 8 6

EW 7; EW 2N; EW 2; NS 2; Par −2210

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S−11006.000.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 6-Bridges-Carter
4 W66804.002.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
4 W66804.002.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 W66804.002.005-Musso-Loh vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 W77101.005.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
4 W77101.005.007-Boyd-Kral vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 E77101.005.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 9 4
J 10 6 5 4
K 4 2
6 4
J 10 6 5 3 2
7
A 8 7 6 3
3
N
WE
S
Q 8 7
A K Q 9 2
K Q J 9 5
7
5    17
11
A
8 3
Q J 10 9 5
A 10 8 7 2

EW 4; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ×W−35006.000.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 W−1504.501.502-Parkins-Block vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
6 W−1504.501.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 ×N−12003.003.007-Boyd-Kral vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 W44201.504.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 W44201.504.505-Musso-Loh vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 W54500.006.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 6-Bridges-Carter

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
10 9 7 6 4
A K 4
K Q 8 5
4
K 8 5 2
8 7 6 5 2
10
A 7 2
N
WE
S
Q J 10 3
J 6 4 3
K J 10 9 5
12
7    8
13
A Q J 3
9
A 9 7 2
Q 8 6 3

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 4; EW 2; EW 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×W−25006.000.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
4 N54503.003.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 N54503.003.002-Parkins-Block vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 N54503.003.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 N54503.003.005-Musso-Loh vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 N54503.003.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 6-Bridges-Carter
4 N44200.006.007-Boyd-Kral vs 4-Cardillo-Dick

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A Q 5
Q J 8 6 5
K 6
Q 6 5
K 6 4 2
A
A Q 8 2
K 10 9 7
N
WE
S
J 9
K 9 3 2
9 4
A J 8 3 2
14
16    9
1
10 8 7 3
10 7 4
J 10 7 5 3
4

EW 3N; W 5; E 4; EW 2; EW 1; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−33006.000.002-Parkins-Block vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTW−11005.001.007-Boyd-Kral vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
1 NTE1904.002.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 6-Bridges-Carter
2 W31103.003.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
1 NTE41802.004.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTE46300.505.505-Musso-Loh vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 NTE46300.505.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
10 2
10 6 4 3
A K Q 10 4 3
K
7 5 3
9
6 2
Q J 9 8 6 5 4
N
WE
S
K Q 6 4
J 8
J 8 7 5
10 3 2
12
3    7
18
A J 9 8
A K Q 7 5 2
9
A 7

N 7N; NS 7; S 6N; NS 6; NS 5; NS 1; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7 S715104.501.502-Parkins-Block vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
7 S715104.501.505-Musso-Loh vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
7 S715104.501.507-Boyd-Kral vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
7 S715104.501.508-Lawrence-Olson vs 6-Bridges-Carter
6 S710101.005.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
6 S710101.005.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
6 S710101.005.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
A K J 8 4
K 9 5
J 10
7 4 3
Q 10 5
A Q 10 7 6 4 3
9 8
K
N
WE
S
9 7 6 2
J
A K 7 2
Q J 9 6
12
11    11
6
3
8 2
Q 6 5 4 3
A 10 8 5 2

EW 2; NS 1N; W 1; NS 1; Par −100: NS 2N×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−22006.000.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 W−11004.501.502-Parkins-Block vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 W−11004.501.507-Boyd-Kral vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
2 N−1503.003.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
2 W21101.504.505-Musso-Loh vs 6-Bridges-Carter
2 W21101.504.508-Lawrence-Olson vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
2 NTS−42000.006.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 8 7 5
Q
K 10 9
7 6 5 4 3
Q J 9 6 3
10 6 4 3
A 8 2
J
N
WE
S
K 10 2
J 8 7 5
5 4 3
A Q 10
9
8    10
13
4
A K 9 2
Q J 7 6
K 9 8 2

NS 4; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W−55006.000.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 S41303.502.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 S41303.502.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 S41303.502.505-Musso-Loh vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 S41303.502.508-Lawrence-Olson vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
1 NTS21201.005.007-Boyd-Kral vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 S31100.006.002-Parkins-Block vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
6 5 4 2
J 8 7 4
J 7 6
6 3
K J 9
Q 10 5 3
K 9 5
Q 7 4
N
WE
S
Q 10 8 7
9
A 10 8 3
A J 9 8
2
11    11
16
A 3
A K 6 2
Q 4 2
K 10 5 2

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 3; E 3; W 2; E 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS1906.000.005-Musso-Loh vs 6-Bridges-Carter
1 S1705.001.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
1 NTS−1502.503.502-Parkins-Block vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
2 S−1502.503.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
1 NTS−1502.503.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
2 N−1502.503.507-Boyd-Kral vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
2 S−42000.006.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
9 8 7 5 3 2
A 9 4 3
A
4 3
6
Q J 8 7
J 10 9 8 6 4
K 2
N
WE
S
A J
K 2
Q 7 5 2
A J 10 9 6
8
7    15
10
K Q 10 4
10 6 5
K 3
Q 8 7 5

EW 4; NS 2; NS 1N; EW 2; NS 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−31506.000.007-Boyd-Kral vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 N31405.001.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
1 NTE−1504.002.002-Parkins-Block vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 W41302.004.005-Musso-Loh vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 W41302.004.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 E41302.004.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
2 E51500.006.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A Q 7 3
8 3
J 6 3
Q 9 5 4
5
2
A K Q 9
A J 10 8 7 3 2
N
WE
S
10 8 6
Q J 10 7 5 4
8 7 5 4
9
14    3
14
K J 9 4 2
A K 9 6
10 2
K 6

NS 3; NS 2N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ×W−411005.500.502-Parkins-Block vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
5 ×E−411005.500.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 ×W−25004.002.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 W−22003.003.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 S−11002.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Bridges-Carter
2 E21101.005.007-Boyd-Kral vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
4 ×S−12000.006.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
9 4 3 2
A Q 3
J 10 9 3
9 6
Q 7 6 5
8 7 5
A K 8 5
10 8
N
WE
S
A K J 10 8
6 4 2
7
A 7 5 4
7
9    12
12
K J 10 9
Q 6 4 2
K Q J 3 2

EW 3; EW 2N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 1; Par −100: NS 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−1504.501.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Bridges-Carter
4 E−1504.501.502-Parkins-Block vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 E−1504.501.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 E−1504.501.508-Lawrence-Olson vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
4 ×N−11002.004.007-Boyd-Kral vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 E31400.505.504-Bingham-Feldman vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
3 E31400.505.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
10 7 5 4
A Q J 10 4
J 9
J 5
K J 8 3 2
6
A 3 2
K 10 4 3
N
WE
S
6
9 5 2
Q 10 8 7 6 5 4
A 6
9
11    6
14
A Q 9
K 8 7 3
K
Q 9 8 7 2

EW 5; NS 2; EW 1N; EW 1; S 1; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46206.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 N31405.001.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 N−22004.002.007-Boyd-Kral vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
4 N−33003.003.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
5 E54002.004.002-Parkins-Block vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
5 ×E55500.505.504-Bingham-Feldman vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
5 ×E55500.505.508-Lawrence-Olson vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
10 5 3
Q 9 4 3
K 9
A J 9 7
K 8 7 6
A 8 6
10 6 4 3
Q 3
N
WE
S
A Q J 2
K J 7 5
A 8 7 2
6
10
9    15
6
9 4
10 2
Q J 5
K 10 8 5 4 2

EW 4; EW 3; EW 4; EW 1N; NS 2; Par −500: NS 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−33006.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Bridges-Carter
5 ×S−35005.001.007-Boyd-Kral vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
4 W46202.004.002-Parkins-Block vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 W46202.004.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 W46202.004.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 W46202.004.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 E46202.004.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A 8 2
9
A J 8 7 6 3 2
5 3
Q J 9 7 5 4 3
2
K 4
K 9 8
N
WE
S
K 10
10 8 5 4 3
A J 10 7 4 2
9
9    8
14
6
A K Q J 7 6
Q 10 9 5
Q 6

EW 4; NS 5; NS 3; EW 4; NS 1N; Par +100: EW 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×N55506.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 S64804.501.502-Parkins-Block vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 S64804.501.505-Musso-Loh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
5 N74403.003.007-Boyd-Kral vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 N51502.004.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
5 ×W−11001.005.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
5 N−1500.006.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
4
A 3
A J 10 6 3 2
A K Q 3
Q 10 8 7 6
K J 10 7 2
Q 8 5
N
WE
S
K J 9 5 3 2
8
9 7 4
J 10 6
18
8    5
9
A
Q 9 6 5 4
K
9 8 7 5 4 2

NS 7; NS 4N; S 5; EW 3; NS 3; N 4; Par +800: EW 7×−4

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 N66206.000.005-Musso-Loh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
5 N56004.501.502-Parkins-Block vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
5 N56004.501.507-Boyd-Kral vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
6 ×W−35003.003.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
5 N−11001.504.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
5 N−11001.504.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
6 ×N−12000.006.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
6
K J
Q 10 8 5 4
A K Q J 4
Q 7 4 3 2
Q 9 4
A K J 3
10
N
WE
S
A 10 8
10 5 2
6 2
8 7 6 5 3
16
12    4
8
K J 9 5
A 8 7 6 3
9 7
9 2

NS 3N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2; W 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS34006.000.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
2 NTN31505.001.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
3 S31103.003.002-Parkins-Block vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 S31103.003.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 S31103.003.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 S−1501.005.007-Boyd-Kral vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 S−21000.006.005-Musso-Loh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
J 8 5
A K 7 4
6 5 4
J 7 5
K 7 6 2
J 9 6
Q 9 8 3
Q 8
N
WE
S
9 4
Q 8 3 2
A K 7 2
A 9 4
9
8    13
10
A Q 10 3
10 5
J 10
K 10 6 3 2

EW 2; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 2; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−11005.500.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
1 NTE−11005.500.504-Bingham-Feldman vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
1 NTE1904.002.007-Boyd-Kral vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
2 E31102.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
2 E31102.004.005-Musso-Loh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
1102.004.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
1 NTE21200.006.002-Parkins-Block vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
4
9 7 4 3
K 6 2
K 9 7 5 4
7 6 3
K 8 2
A Q J 9 5
Q 6
N
WE
S
K Q 9 5
10 6 5
10 8 3
A 8 2
6
12    9
13
A J 10 8 2
A Q J
7 4
J 10 3

S 2; NS 2; NS 3; N 1; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×W−23006.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 W−31505.001.002-Parkins-Block vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 W−21003.502.503-Falgout-Krauss vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 W−21003.502.504-Bingham-Feldman vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 E−1502.004.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 W31101.005.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
2 NTE21200.006.005-Musso-Loh vs 4-Cardillo-Dick

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
K 8 5
K J 9 4 2
A 3
10 8 5
J 6 2
A Q 10 3
K J 10 9 7
K
N
WE
S
A 10 7 3
8 7 6
Q 5 4
A 7 2
11
14    10
5
Q 9 4
5
8 6 2
Q J 9 6 4 3

W 3; EW 2N; E 2; W 2; EW 3; E 1; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S2906.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 N−1505.001.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 S−21004.002.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
2 E31402.503.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 E31402.503.508-Lawrence-Olson vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
1 NTW52101.005.005-Musso-Loh vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
3 NT×N−48000.006.002-Parkins-Block vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
7
A J 5 4 2
A K 2
J 7 6 2
9 5
7 6
Q 10 9 7 4 3
10 9 3
N
WE
S
Q 10 8 3 2
K Q 3
8 5
A K 4
13
2    14
11
A K J 6 4
10 9 8
J 6
Q 8 5

NS 3; NS 2N; NS 2; NS 3; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTS21206.000.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
1 E−11005.001.002-Parkins-Block vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 N−11002.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
4 N−11002.004.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 N−11002.004.005-Musso-Loh vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 N−11002.004.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 6-Bridges-Carter
4 N−11002.004.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
K 10 7 3
J 8
J 7 5 3
J 9 6
9 2
A K 9 4
A 10 4 2
7 4 3
N
WE
S
A Q J 4
Q 10 7
K 9
A 10 5 2
6
11    16
7
8 6 5
6 5 3 2
Q 8 6
K Q 8

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 4; EW 5; EW 4; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE44304.002.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 NTE44304.002.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTE44304.002.005-Musso-Loh vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
3 NTE44304.002.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 NTE44304.002.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 NTE54600.505.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 NTE54600.505.502-Parkins-Block vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
K 10 8 7
Q J 10 6
A 7 5 2
4
A 7 3
Q 8 4
A Q 10 9 7 5 3
N
WE
S
A Q 9 6 3 2
K 9 8
K 10
8 2
10
12    12
6
J 5 4
5 4 2
J 9 6 3
K J 6

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 2; EW 2; EW 1; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E41306.000.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 W61705.001.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTE56603.003.002-Parkins-Block vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
3 NTE56603.003.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 NTE56603.003.007-Boyd-Kral vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 NTE66901.005.005-Musso-Loh vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 ×S−48000.006.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
J 9 8 5 2
10 9
K 7 4 2
A 4
7
A K 8 7 6
10 6 5
J 9 3 2
N
WE
S
A K Q 3
5 4
9 3
Q 8 7 6 5
8
8    11
13
10 6 4
Q J 3 2
A Q J 8
K 10

EW 3; NS 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ×N26706.000.005-Musso-Loh vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
5 ×E−12004.501.504-Bingham-Feldman vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 W−22004.501.507-Boyd-Kral vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
1 NTS21202.503.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
1 NTS21202.503.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
2 N21101.005.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 6-Bridges-Carter
2 N−11000.006.002-Parkins-Block vs 4-Cardillo-Dick

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
A J 10 9
K 8 6 4 2
7 4
Q 8
8
9 3
Q 10 9 8 6
10 9 7 6 5
N
WE
S
K Q 7 6 3
Q J 10 5
J
A K 2
10
2    16
12
5 4 2
A 7
A K 5 3 2
J 4 3

N 2N; NS 2; N 2; S 1N; S 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×W−35006.000.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
2 N21105.001.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 6-Bridges-Carter
1 E−21004.002.002-Parkins-Block vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
1 NTN1902.503.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
1 NTN1902.503.507-Boyd-Kral vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 W−1501.005.005-Musso-Loh vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
2 NTN−1500.006.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
9
9 5 4 3
10 9 5 4 3
8 7 4
Q 10 8
A 8 2
K 8 7
K 10 3 2
N
WE
S
A K J 6 4 3
J 10 7 6
J 2
9
0
12    10
18
7 5 2
K Q
A Q 6
A Q J 6 5

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 2; S 2; S 2; N 1; N 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ×S21806.000.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 6-Bridges-Carter
2 E41704.501.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 E41704.501.507-Boyd-Kral vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 E44202.503.502-Parkins-Block vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 E44202.503.505-Musso-Loh vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
4 E54501.005.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 1-Wakefield-Bauman
3 NT×W35500.006.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
A Q 3 2
K 8 6
A 10 3
A Q 7
10
J 10 5 3
9 8 7 2
J 9 4 2
N
WE
S
K J 8 7 6
Q 9 7 4
Q J
10 8
19
2    9
10
9 5 4
A 2
K 6 5 4
K 6 5 3

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 5; NS 4; NS 2; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN46305.001.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTN46305.001.005-Musso-Loh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTN46305.001.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 NTS36002.503.502-Parkins-Block vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 NTN36002.503.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
3 NTS−11001.005.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 NTS−22000.006.007-Boyd-Kral vs 6-Bridges-Carter

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
A K J 4 3
8 7 2
J 6 3
A Q
10 9 8 2
5
Q 7
K J 9 7 4 2
N
WE
S
7
Q 9 6 4 3
K 9 8 4
10 8 6
15
6    5
14
Q 6 5
A K J 10
A 10 5 2
5 3

NS 6N; NS 6; NS 5; NS 5; NS 1; Par +990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N64804.002.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 N64804.002.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
4 N64804.002.005-Musso-Loh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 N64804.002.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 N64804.002.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
4 N54501.005.007-Boyd-Kral vs 6-Bridges-Carter
4 E64800.006.002-Parkins-Block vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 7 6
10 9 3
10 7 5 2
7 2
J 9 2
6 4
A Q J 9 6 4
K 5
N
WE
S
K 8 5 4
A Q 5
K
A 9 8 6 3
6
11    16
7
10 3
K J 8 7 2
8 3
Q J 10 4

EW 4N; EW 3; EW 4; EW 3; E 1; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W31105.500.504-Bingham-Feldman vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 W31105.500.506-Hampton-Hampton vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
4 E44204.002.007-Boyd-Kral vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 NTE44303.003.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
3 NTE54601.005.002-Parkins-Block vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis
3 NTE54601.005.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTE54601.005.005-Musso-Loh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
K 5 4 3 2
Q 9 3
J 4 3 2
3
A Q
A K J
9 6
A Q 9 8 6 2
N
WE
S
8
10 6 4
K Q 8 7
K J 10 5 4
6
20    9
5
J 10 9 7 6
8 7 5 2
A 10 5
7

W 5N; E 3N; EW 5; EW 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW66904.002.004-Bingham-Feldman vs 7-Steinfeldt-Lavender
3 NTW66904.002.005-Musso-Loh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTW66904.002.006-Hampton-Hampton vs 4-Cardillo-Dick
3 NTW66904.002.007-Boyd-Kral vs 6-Bridges-Carter
3 NTW66904.002.008-Lawrence-Olson vs 8-Feldman-Jennings
6 ×N−511001.005.003-Falgout-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
6 W613700.006.002-Parkins-Block vs 3-Tonnesen-Davis