Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 6, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   37.5      Section E  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   47.51   35.63  A                             Richard Long - Carol Goldstone
  2   41.67   31.25  A                             Cordellia Scruggs - Arlene Schettler
  3   55.00   41.25  C   2                0.25(A)  Gayle Tomasetti - Rose Marie Sanders
  4   55.84   41.88  C   1     1     1    0.35(A)  Patricia Greason - Rebecca Sekse
  5   50.00   37.50  B                             Pat Fitzgibbons - Sue Gruskiewicz

199er Pairs Thursday Eve Session February 6, 2014
Scores after  5 rounds  Average:   37.5      Section E  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   64.00   48.00  C   1     1     1    0.35(A)  John Peterson - Richard Poznanski
  2   56.00   42.00  C                             Jeanne Theis - Philip Theis
  3   56.67   42.50  A   2                0.25(A)  Walt Pumo - Janice Pumo
  4   23.33   17.50  C                             Evelyn Reneer - Kathy Parkins

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠8 5 4
♥A
♦J 6 4
♣J 9 8 7 3 2
♠Q 9
♥K Q J 8
♦A K 10 2
♣A K 4
N
WE
S
♠A 7
♥9 7 6 5 4 3
♦7 5
♣Q 6 5
6
22    6
6
♠K J 10 6 3 2
♥10 2
♦Q 9 8 3
♣10

E 5N; EW 4♥; W 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♠; EW 1♣; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−31503.000.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♥E54501.002.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 ♥E54501.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♥E54501.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠8 7
♥6 4 3 2
♦8 7 4 3
♣J 10 9
♠A 10 6 3
♥A 9 5
♦9 6
♣A K 4 2
N
WE
S
♠K 4 2
♥Q 10 8
♦K J 5
♣Q 8 7 3
1
15    11
13
♠Q J 9 5
♥K J 7
♦A Q 10 2
♣6 5

E 4N; W 3N; EW 3♠; E 4♣; EW 2♥; W 3♣; EW 1♦; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1503.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 NTW21202.001.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♣E41301.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
1 NTE41800.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠Q 3
♥A Q 10 6 5
♦7 5 4 2
♣10 6
♠K 10 9 4
♥J 2
♦A J 9
♣K Q 9 7
N
WE
S
♠J 8
♥K 8 7 4 3
♦K Q 8
♣5 4 2
8
14    9
9
♠A 7 6 5 2
♥9
♦10 6 3
♣A J 8 3

EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−22003.000.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 ♣W−11001.501.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
1 NTE−11001.501.504-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 NTE21200.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠A Q
♥A J 7
♦K Q 6 5
♣9 8 5 2
♠K J 10 9 2
♥10 5 3
♦8 2
♣K 4 3
N
WE
S
♠8 7 6 5
♥—
♦A 10 4 3
♣Q J 10 7 6
16
7    7
10
♠4 3
♥K Q 9 8 6 4 2
♦J 9 7
♣A

NS 6♥; NS 4N; NS 4♦; EW 2♠; EW 1♣; Par +1100: EW 6♠×−4

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♥N614303.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 ♥N66801.002.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 ♥N66801.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♥S66801.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠A Q 8 7 6 5 2
♥K 7 2
♦6 2
♣2
♠K
♥10 9 5 4
♦K 8 5
♣K 9 8 7 6
N
WE
S
♠J 9 4
♥J 8 3
♦9 7 4
♣A Q J 10
9
9    9
13
♠10 3
♥A Q 6
♦A Q J 10 3
♣5 4 3

NS 4♠; NS 3♦; NS 1N; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N46203.000.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 ♠N41702.001.001-Long-Goldstone vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 ♦S−11000.502.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
5 ♦S−11000.502.504-Greason-Sekse vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠8 7
♥J 9 5 4 2
♦K 10
♣Q 5 3 2
♠K 10 5 3
♥6 3
♦Q 8 5
♣A 9 8 7
N
WE
S
♠Q J 9 4 2
♥K 10 7
♦9 6 3 2
♣4
6
9    6
19
♠A 6
♥A Q 8
♦A J 7 4
♣K J 10 6

NS 5♥; NS 5♣; NS 2N; NS 3♦; EW 1♠; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥N54502.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♥N54502.500.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 NTS52101.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
2 ♣S41300.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠A 8 3 2
♥A 8 6
♦9 2
♣K Q 10 7
♠Q J 7 6 4
♥Q 10
♦6 5 3
♣6 3 2
N
WE
S
♠10 5
♥K 7 5 2
♦K Q J 4
♣A 9 5
13
5    13
9
♠K 9
♥J 9 4 3
♦A 10 8 7
♣J 8 4

S 3♥; NS 2N; N 2♥; S 2♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; N 1♦; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W−22003.000.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 ♥S31402.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
1 ♠N21101.002.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
1 NTN1900.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠A J 10 6 5 2
♥9 8 4
♦9
♣10 8 7
♠—
♥K Q J 3
♦A 3 2
♣A J 6 4 3 2
N
WE
S
♠8
♥A 10 7 6
♦J 10 8 7 6 5 4
♣Q
5
15    7
13
♠K Q 9 7 4 3
♥5 2
♦K Q
♣K 9 5

EW 6♥; EW 6♦; EW 5♣; EW 1N; NS 1♠; Par −980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♥E−31502.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
5 ♣W−31502.500.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
5 ♥E64801.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis
6 ♦×E610900.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠Q J 9 6 4 3 2
♥5
♦A K
♣J 10 9
♠7
♥A K 8 6 3
♦J 8 5 4
♣Q 6 2
N
WE
S
♠A 8
♥J 9 2
♦10 9 6 3
♣A 8 5 3
11
10    9
10
♠K 10 5
♥Q 10 7 4
♦Q 7 2
♣K 7 4

NS 3♠; EW 2♥; EW 3♦; S 1N; EW 2♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N44202.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♠N44202.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 ♠N41701.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
3 ♠N31400.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠A 7 6 3
♥—
♦K Q J 10 4 3
♣A K 10
♠J 10 8
♥A 9 7
♦9
♣Q 6 5 4 3 2
N
WE
S
♠—
♥K Q 10 8 6 5 2
♦A 8 5
♣J 9 7
17
7    10
6
♠K Q 9 5 4 2
♥J 4 3
♦7 6 2
♣8

N 6♦; NS 5♠; EW 4♥; S 5♦; EW 3♣; Par +500: EW 6♥×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S66803.000.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
6 ♥S−11001.501.504-Greason-Sekse vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
5 ♠S−11001.501.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♥E56500.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠Q 7 2
♥10 8 7 4
♦K 7 2
♣K 6 5
♠9 6 4
♥J 5
♦A 10 6 5 4
♣9 8 4
N
WE
S
♠K J 10 5 3
♥Q 9 2
♦8
♣Q 10 7 3
8
5    8
19
♠A 8
♥A K 6 3
♦Q J 9 3
♣A J 2

N 4N; NS 4♥; S 2N; NS 3♦; N 3♣; NS 1♠; S 1♣; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥N54502.500.501-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♥N54502.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♥N44201.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♥S31400.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠3 2
♥Q 8 6 4 3
♦J 10
♣10 8 6 5
♠5
♥K 5
♦K 8 5 2
♣A K J 7 4 2
N
WE
S
♠A K Q J 10 8 4
♥A 7 2
♦Q
♣Q 9
3
14    18
5
♠9 7 6
♥J 10 9
♦A 9 7 6 4 3
♣3

EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♣; EW 2♥; EW 2♦; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠E62303.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
5 ♣W64202.001.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
5 ♠E75101.002.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
6 NTW710200.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠A 10 7 2
♥A Q 8
♦A K 5 3
♣9 4
♠5 4
♥7 3 2
♦10 7 2
♣Q J 10 7 3
N
WE
S
♠Q 3
♥K J 9 6 4
♦Q J 8 6
♣K 6
17
3    12
8
♠K J 9 8 6
♥10 5
♦9 4
♣A 8 5 2

NS 5♠; N 4N; S 3N; N 4♦; N 2♥; S 3♦; NS 2♣; S 1♥; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N56502.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 ♠N56502.500.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTN46301.002.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♠S46200.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠A Q J 6 3
♥K Q 10
♦K 10 7 6
♣2
♠10 8
♥5 4
♦Q 5 4 3
♣K Q 8 5 3
N
WE
S
♠K 7 4 2
♥J 8 6 2
♦A 2
♣9 6 4
15
7    8
10
♠9 5
♥A 9 7 3
♦J 9 8
♣A J 10 7

NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 3♥; NS 3♦; NS 1♣; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N54503.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
2 ♠N41701.501.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 ♥S41701.501.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 NTN−1500.003.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠A 4
♥A Q J 10 8 6
♦K Q 2
♣A 5
♠K Q J 8 6 5
♥K 9 4 2
♦J 8 4
♣—
N
WE
S
♠10 9 7
♥7
♦7 6 5
♣9 8 7 4 3 2
20
10    0
10
♠3 2
♥5 3
♦A 10 9 3
♣K Q J 10 6

NS 7N; S 7♦; N 6♦; S 5♥; N 4♥; NS 5♣; S 1♠; Par +2220

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥×S59903.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♥N56501.501.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
4 ♥N56501.501.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♠×W−23000.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠Q 2
♥7
♦A J 8 2
♣K Q J 10 5 4
♠7
♥A K Q 8 6 2
♦K 10 7
♣9 3 2
N
WE
S
♠A K J 10 8 6 5
♥9
♦9 4 3
♣A 8
13
12    12
3
♠9 4 3
♥J 10 5 4 3
♦Q 6 5
♣7 6

EW 5N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; W 2♦; NS 2♣; E 1♦; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E−11002.500.501-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♥W−11002.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 ♠E31401.002.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 ♠E66800.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠A 7 4
♥10 3
♦Q J 10 7 6 2
♣A 4
♠Q 9 8 5
♥J 8 7 4
♦5
♣Q J 6 2
N
WE
S
♠10 3 2
♥9 5
♦K 9 8 4 3
♣K 10 7
11
6    6
17
♠K J 6
♥A K Q 6 2
♦A
♣9 8 5 3

NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 4♦; NS 2♠; NS 2♣; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥N54503.000.001-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♥S44202.001.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
2 ♥S31401.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 ♦N41300.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠Q 10 8 6
♥10
♦J 9 7 6 5 2
♣J 8
♠K J 5 2
♥K J 5 3
♦A
♣7 6 4 2
N
WE
S
♠A 4 3
♥A 9 2
♦K Q 8
♣A Q 10 9
4
12    19
5
♠9 7
♥Q 8 7 6 4
♦10 4 3
♣K 5 3

EW 6♣; EW 5N; EW 5♥; EW 4♠; EW 2♦; Par −920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE34003.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 NTE54601.501.501-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
3 NTE54601.501.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
6 NTE69900.003.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠8 5
♥Q 10 5
♦A Q J 3
♣K 10 5 3
♠J 10 7
♥J 8 6 2
♦K 2
♣Q 6 4 2
N
WE
S
♠A K 6 4 3 2
♥7 3
♦10 8 5
♣J 9
12
7    8
13
♠Q 9
♥A K 9 4
♦9 7 6 4
♣A 8 7

NS 4N; NS 4♥; NS 4♦; NS 4♣; EW 1♠; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN44303.000.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♠E−22002.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 ♦S41300.502.501-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
4 ♦S41300.502.505-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠J 3 2
♥6 4 3
♦Q 10 9 2
♣K J 8
♠K 10 5
♥J 7 2
♦7 6 3
♣Q 7 6 3
N
WE
S
♠A 9
♥A K Q 9 8
♦J 5 4
♣10 5 4
7
6    14
13
♠Q 8 7 6 4
♥10 5
♦A K 8
♣A 9 2

NS 3♠; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; N 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥E−33003.000.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 2-Theis-Theis
3 ♥E−22002.001.004-Greason-Sekse vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
2 ♠S21101.002.005-Fitzgibbons-Gruskiewicz vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 ♥E−11000.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠K 9 3 2
♥Q 7 6
♦10 9 7
♣Q 9 3
♠10 8 5
♥9 5 2
♦K Q 8 6
♣A K 5
N
WE
S
♠Q 7 4
♥J 10 8 4
♦J 4 3
♣J 7 4
7
12    5
16
♠A J 6
♥A K 3
♦A 5 2
♣10 8 6 2

NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 2♥; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS21202.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
2 NTS21202.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
1 NTN1900.502.501-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
1 NTS1900.502.504-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠4
♥A K 9 6 3
♦A 10
♣Q 8 7 6 2
♠A K 7 6
♥Q J 2
♦8 2
♣A J 10 5
N
WE
S
♠Q J 10 3
♥10 8 7 5
♦9 5 4 3
♣K
13
15    6
6
♠9 8 5 2
♥4
♦K Q J 7 6
♣9 4 3

EW 2♠; NS 1N; NS 2♣; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; Par −100: NS 2N×−1; NS 3♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠E−11002.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 ♠E−11002.500.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 ♦S−1501.002.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 ♥N−21000.003.001-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠9 6
♥Q 10
♦K 10 9 8 5 4
♣A J 6
♠5
♥K 8 6 4 3
♦Q 3
♣7 5 4 3 2
N
WE
S
♠Q 8 3
♥A J 2
♦A J 7 6 2
♣Q 9
10
5    14
11
♠A K J 10 7 4 2
♥9 7 5
♦—
♣K 10 8

NS 4♠; N 2N; E 2♥; W 1♥; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠S41703.000.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
2 ♠N31401.501.501-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♠S31401.501.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♠S−11000.003.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠10 9 5 2
♥8
♦7 5 4
♣Q 10 7 5 2
♠K Q 6
♥Q 9 6 2
♦K 8
♣J 9 8 4
N
WE
S
♠8 7 4
♥A 7 5 4
♦A Q 9 3
♣K 6
2
11    13
14
♠A J 3
♥K J 10 3
♦J 10 6 2
♣A 3

EW 2N; EW 2♥; E 2♦; EW 1♠; W 1♦; E 1♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥W−21002.500.502-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
3 ♥W−21002.500.504-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo
3 ♥W−1500.502.501-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
2 ♥W−1500.502.503-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠8 5 2
♥5 4 3
♦K 7 3
♣K Q 9 8
♠A 3
♥J 10 9
♦J 10 9 8 6
♣J 4 2
N
WE
S
♠K Q 10 9 7 6
♥8
♦Q 2
♣10 6 5 3
8
7    7
18
♠J 4
♥A K Q 7 6 2
♦A 5 4
♣A 7

NS 4♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥S44202.001.001-Long-Goldstone vs 2-Theis-Theis
4 ♥S44202.001.002-Scruggs-Schettler vs 4-Reneer-Parkins
4 ♥S44202.001.003-Tomasetti-Sanders vs 1-Peterson-Poznanski
3 ♥S41700.003.004-Greason-Sekse vs 3-Pumo-Pumo