Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  
A/X Pairs Thursday Eve Session January 30, 2014
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score    Sectn Rank  O/All Rank    MPs
                         A     B     A     B
  1   52.48   88.17  A   2           5          1.61(OA) David Fleischer - Charles Yaple
  2   42.29   71.04  B                                   Rick Bingham - Leo Cardillo
  3   56.55   95.00  A   1           1          5.10(OA) David Rodney - Rusty Krauss
  4   49.55   83.25  B         1           2    1.25(OB) Jay Cherlow - Albert Lauber
  5   51.19   86.00  A                                   Peter Boyd - Steve Reed
  6   45.93   77.17  B                                   Mel Yudkin - Dhirendra Ghosh
  7   51.74   86.92  A   3                      0.60(SA) Vonnie Lavender - Robert Gookin

A/X Pairs Thursday Eve Session January 30, 2014
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score    Sectn Rank  O/All Rank    MPs
                         A     B     A     B
  1   55.36   93.00  A   1           2          3.83(OA) Joan Lewis - Robert Hopkins Jr
  2   41.71   70.08  B                                   James Gerding - W Karl Van Newkirk
  3   54.61   91.75  A   2           3          2.87(OA) Bruce Houston - Kenneth Davis
  4   49.90   83.83  B         1           1    1.66(OB) Mark Lavine - Jim Dick
  5   52.98   89.00  A   3           4          2.15(OA) Thomas Lavender - Terry Lavender
  6   46.91   78.81  B                                   Kamel Tabbara - Ramsey Bordcosh
  7   48.41   81.33  A                                   Ronald Kral - Robert Boyd

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
10 4
K 9 5 3 2
A 8
Q 9 7 6
K 6 5
A 6
K 3 2
J 8 4 3 2
N
WE
S
9 7 3 2
J 10 4
10 6
A K 10 5
9
11    8
12
A Q J 8
Q 8 7
Q J 9 7 5 4

NS 3; NS 4; NS 2; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N44206.000.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
5 S54005.001.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
4 ×W−23004.002.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 7-Kral-Boyd
2 S41302.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
2 S41302.004.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 3-Houston-Davis
2 N41302.004.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 4-Lavine-Dick
2 S31100.006.005-Boyd-Reed vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 4
Q 9 6
J 7 4 2
K J 10 9
A K 10 2
A J 8 3
A 8
5 4 3
N
WE
S
9 8
10 7 5 4
Q 10 9 6
Q 8 2
8
16    4
12
Q 7 6 5 3
K 2
K 5 3
A 7 6

EW 2; W 1N; NS 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW−21005.500.505-Boyd-Reed vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
1 NT×E−11005.500.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 4-Lavine-Dick
2 W−1504.002.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 7-Kral-Boyd
1 NTW1902.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
1 NTW1902.004.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
1 NTW1902.004.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
1 NTW21200.006.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
10 9 2
10 5
J 8 6 2
Q 7 6 3
A J 7
A K 8 6
Q 10
K 9 8 2
N
WE
S
K 6 3
4 3
A K 9 5 3
J 10 5
3
17    11
9
Q 8 5 4
Q J 9 7 2
7 4
A 4

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 5; EW 3; EW 2; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11006.000.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 NTW36005.001.005-Boyd-Reed vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTW46302.503.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 NTW46302.503.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTE46302.503.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 NTW46302.503.507-Lavender-Gookin vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 NTW56600.006.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 7-Kral-Boyd

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
2
10 7 3 2
J 10 9 8 7
9 4 3
K J 10
Q 9
5 2
A K 10 8 6 5
N
WE
S
7 5 4
K J 5 4
K 4
Q J 7 2
1
13    10
16
A Q 9 8 6 3
A 8 6
A Q 6 3

NS 6; NS 2; NS 2; E 1N; EW 1; Par +1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S66206.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
4 N61704.501.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 N61704.501.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 7-Kral-Boyd
4 S51502.004.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 N51502.004.005-Boyd-Reed vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 N51502.004.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 NTE46300.006.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 4-Lavine-Dick

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
9 6 4 3 2
8 6
Q 7 6 5 4 3
A K Q
K 10 8 6 4 2
A J
A J
N
WE
S
J 10 5
J 9 7 5
K 5 3 2
K 2
2
22    8
8
8 7
A Q 3
Q 10 9 7 4
10 9 8

EW 6N; EW 6; EW 3; EW 2; NS 1; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W−1506.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Kral-Boyd
4 W54505.001.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 4-Lavine-Dick
5 E64802.004.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 W64802.004.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
4 W64802.004.005-Boyd-Reed vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
4 E64802.004.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 W64802.004.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
8
K 5 4
K 9 7 2
Q 7 5 3 2
9 7 4
J 10 9 2
8 4 3
A 10 4
N
WE
S
K Q J 10 6 5
A
A J 6
J 8 6
8
5    16
11
A 3 2
Q 8 7 6 3
Q 10 5
K 9

EW 2N; EW 2; NS 2; NS 2; NS 1; Par −100: NS 3×−1; NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−22006.000.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 4-Lavine-Dick
4 E−11005.001.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 E31403.502.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Kral-Boyd
3 E31403.502.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 E41701.504.505-Boyd-Reed vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 E41701.504.507-Lavender-Gookin vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 E46200.006.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A Q J 10 7
J 10
K Q J 5
Q 9
K 9 6 5 4 3 2
A K 7 3
3
10
N
WE
S
Q 6 2
A 9 6 2
K J 8 7 6 5
16
10    10
4
8
9 8 5 4
10 8 7 4
A 4 3 2

EW 3; EW 2; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×W−25006.000.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
2 W−11003.003.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Kral-Boyd
2 W−11003.003.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 W−11003.003.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 E−11003.003.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
2 W−11003.003.005-Boyd-Reed vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
2 E31400.006.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
8 6 3
10 7 4 2
6 5
Q 10 4 3
K 7 5 2
A J 9 6
7 4
A 8 6
N
WE
S
Q J 10 4
K 5 3
10 3
J 9 7 2
2
12    7
19
A 9
Q 8
A K Q J 9 8 2
K 5

NS 2N; EW 2; EW 2; NS 3; EW 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1; EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS34006.000.005-Boyd-Reed vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 NTS−1504.501.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 7-Kral-Boyd
3 NTS−1504.501.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 ×S−11001.504.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 NT×S−11001.504.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
4 NTN−21001.504.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 NT×S−11001.504.507-Lavender-Gookin vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 9 6 2
9 7 6 5
8 7
Q 6 5
4 3
Q J 10
A K Q 9 4
10 4 3
N
WE
S
A 5
A K 8
J 6 5
A J 9 8 7
4
12    17
7
K J 10 8 7
4 3 2
10 3 2
K 2

EW 4N; EW 5; EW 5; EW 3; EW 1; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W−11006.000.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 NTE46303.003.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 NTE46303.003.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTE46303.003.005-Boyd-Reed vs 7-Kral-Boyd
3 NTE46303.003.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTE46303.003.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 4-Lavine-Dick
4 ×S−48000.006.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
5
K 10 6 3 2
K 5 3
J 10 9 8
J 7 6
4
J 10 9 8 7 4 2
A 5
N
WE
S
K 10 8 2
A 9 8 5
Q
K Q 4 3
7
6    14
13
A Q 9 4 3
Q J 7
A 6
7 6 2

NS 2N; NS 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−22006.000.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 W−11005.001.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
1 S−11004.002.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 W31102.503.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 W31102.503.505-Boyd-Reed vs 7-Kral-Boyd
1 S−22001.005.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
1 S−33000.006.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 4-Lavine-Dick

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
10 7 5 4 2
A 6 3
K 10 4 2
Q
K
K 10 5
A J 9 8 5
K 6 3 2
N
WE
S
A J 9 6
J 9 7 2
A J 8 7 4
9
14    11
6
Q 8 3
Q 8 4
Q 7 6 3
10 9 5

EW 6; W 5N; EW 5; E 4N; W 3; E 2; EW 3; Par −920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W−1506.000.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 W41305.001.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 E51504.002.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 E41702.004.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 W61702.004.005-Boyd-Reed vs 7-Kral-Boyd
4 W61702.004.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 4-Lavine-Dick
5 W54000.006.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
K J 8 6
Q 8 7
J
A K J 7 5
A Q 5 3
K 6 4
A Q 7 3
6 2
N
WE
S
9 7 2
A 9 3 2
5 2
10 8 4 3
15
15    4
6
10 4
J 10 5
K 10 9 8 6 4
Q 9

NS 1N; NS 2; NS 2; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31105.001.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
2 S31105.001.005-Boyd-Reed vs 7-Kral-Boyd
2 N31105.001.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
1 NTW−21003.003.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 4-Lavine-Dick
1 NTW−1501.504.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 3-Houston-Davis
1 NTW−1501.504.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
1 NTW1900.006.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A Q 3
7 4 3 2
7 5
7 5 3 2
2
8
Q 10 9 4 3 2
A 10 9 8 6
N
WE
S
K 10 8 7 5 4
A Q 5
A K 8
4
6
6    16
12
J 9 6
K J 10 9 6
J 6
K Q J

EW 6; E 4; EW 3N; W 3; E 4; W 2; EW 1; Par −1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−11005.500.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 4-Lavine-Dick
5 W−11005.500.505-Boyd-Reed vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 E31404.002.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 E41703.003.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 S−22002.004.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
5 E56000.505.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 7-Kral-Boyd
5 E56000.505.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
7 6 5 4 3
Q 7 6 5 4 2
2
8
J
9
Q J 10 4
A K Q 9 6 5 3
N
WE
S
A K Q 9 8 2
8
A K 9 8 7
4
2
13    16
9
10
A K J 10 3
6 5 3
J 10 7 2

EW 6; EW 6; NS 4; EW 5; EW 1N; Par −500: NS 7×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 E−1506.000.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 4-Lavine-Dick
6 E69204.002.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 7-Kral-Boyd
6 E69204.002.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
6 E69204.002.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 3-Houston-Davis
6 E69801.005.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
6 E69801.005.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
6 E69801.005.005-Boyd-Reed vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
J 4 2
8 7 5
A K J 7
A Q 8
A 10 8 7 3
J 9 6 2
9
10 7 3
N
WE
S
9 6 5
4 3
Q 8 6 3
K 6 5 2
15
5    5
15
K Q
A K Q 10
10 5 4 2
J 9 4

NS 4N; NS 3; NS 3; NS 4; NS 3; Par +630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS46304.501.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTS46304.501.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 NTS46304.501.505-Boyd-Reed vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 NTN46304.501.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 NTS36001.504.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 7-Kral-Boyd
3 NTS36001.504.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 4-Lavine-Dick
6 NTS−22000.006.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
8 7
9 5
Q J 4 2
A K 9 7 5
10 5 4 3
Q 4
A K 8 7 6
10 2
N
WE
S
K Q 2
K 10 8 7 3 2
Q J 6 4
10
9    11
10
A J 9 6
A J 6
10 9 5 3
8 3

EW 2; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; Par −100: NS 2N×−1; NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−11005.500.505-Boyd-Reed vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
2 E−11005.500.507-Lavender-Gookin vs 3-Houston-Davis
2 E21103.003.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
2 E21103.003.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 7-Kral-Boyd
2 E21103.003.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
2 E31400.505.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 4-Lavine-Dick
2 E31400.505.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
9 6 4
6 5
Q J 6
J 9 6 5 3
10 8
A 10 8 4 3
K 9 8 5
Q 8
N
WE
S
7 3 2
Q J 9 7 2
A 7 3
K 4
4
9    10
17
A K Q J 5
K
10 4 2
A 10 7 2

NS 3; EW 3; NS 3; EW 1N; EW 2; Par +100: EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31404.501.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 S31404.501.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 S31404.501.505-Boyd-Reed vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
1 S31404.501.507-Lavender-Gookin vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 E31401.005.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 E31401.005.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 E31401.005.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 7-Kral-Boyd

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 8 7
J 6
A K Q 9 5
Q 10 5
A 10 6 4 2
7 5 2
8 7 2
K 4
N
WE
S
K 9 5 3
9 3
3
A J 9 8 7 3
14
7    8
11
J
A K Q 10 8 4
J 10 6 4
6 2

EW 4; NS 4; NS 4; EW 4; Par −200: NS 5×−1; NS 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S56506.000.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
4 S46205.001.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 S52004.002.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 S41703.003.005-Boyd-Reed vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTN−44002.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Lavine-Dick
4 ×W45900.505.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
4 ×E45900.505.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 7-Kral-Boyd

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
5 4
10 9 7 5
J 8 6 5 2
6 2
6 2
A K Q J 8 2
A 9 4
Q 5
N
WE
S
J 9 8 7
6 3
K Q 10 7
A 9 3
1
16    10
13
A K Q 10 3
4
3
K J 10 8 7 4

E 4N; EW 4; EW 4; W 2N; NS 3; EW 1; Par −300: NS 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31106.000.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
5 ×S−23005.001.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 NTE56604.002.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 ×N−48003.003.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 7-Kral-Boyd
4 ×S−511001.504.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
4 ×S−511001.504.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 NT×E511500.006.005-Boyd-Reed vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
J 6 5
Q 9 7 6 4
J 3
9 8 3
7 3 2
A J 3
K 8 6 5
A 7 6
N
WE
S
A 9 8
10
Q 10 9 7 4
K J 4 2
4
12    10
14
K Q 10 4
K 8 5 2
A 2
Q 10 5

EW 2N; NS 2; EW 3; EW 3; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N21105.920.087-Lavender-Gookin vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
2 NTW21204.751.254-Cherlow-Lauber vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 W41303.003.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 W41303.003.005-Boyd-Reed vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 N−22000.675.331-Fleischer-Yaple vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 N−22000.675.336-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 7-Kral-Boyd

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 7
4 3
A Q
K Q J 8 7 5
Q 9 6 4
8 6 2
K 9 2
9 4 2
N
WE
S
K J 2
A 9 7 5
8 5 4
A 10 3
16
5    12
7
8 5 3
K Q J 10
J 10 7 6 3
6

NS 2N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2; NS 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN46306.000.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 7-Kral-Boyd
3 NTN36005.001.005-Boyd-Reed vs 4-Lavine-Dick
1 NTN41804.002.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
2 N41302.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 N41302.004.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
2 N41302.004.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 N31100.006.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
A Q 8 7 6
Q 7
9 7 5 3
K 6
J 5
K 10 4 3
A Q 10 8
8 5 4
N
WE
S
K 10 2
6 5
K 6 4 2
A Q J 10
11
10    13
6
9 4 3
A J 9 8 2
J
9 7 3 2

EW 4N; EW 5; EW 4; EW 2; EW 1; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E41305.500.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
3 E41305.500.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 E51502.503.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 E51502.503.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 7-Kral-Boyd
2 NTE31502.503.505-Boyd-Reed vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 E51502.503.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
2 NTW41800.006.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
J 4 3
A J 6
A J 9 5
J 5 4
A K 9 6 5
K 7
7 6 4
10 6 3
N
WE
S
10 8 2
9 4 3 2
10 8 2
A Q 9
12
10    6
12
Q 7
Q 10 8 5
K Q 3
K 8 7 2

NS 3N; NS 3; NS 4; NS 3; NS 1; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 ×W−12006.000.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Houston-Davis
2 NTN41805.001.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
1 NTS31504.002.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 7-Kral-Boyd
3 N41302.503.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 N41302.503.505-Boyd-Reed vs 4-Lavine-Dick
PassPass1.005.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
4 N−11000.006.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
10 7 5 4 3 2
A J
Q 2
Q 7 5
8
8 6 3
A 10 6 4
A J 10 9 2
N
WE
S
Q 9
K Q 9 5 2
9 8 5
K 8 3
9
9    10
12
A K J 6
10 7 4
K J 7 3
6 4

NS 3; EW 2; EW 3; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +100: EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N52006.000.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 S41704.002.005-Boyd-Reed vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 N41704.002.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 N41704.002.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
3 N31401.504.501-Fleischer-Yaple vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 N31401.504.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 7-Kral-Boyd
4 N−1500.006.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 5-Lavender-Lavender

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
2
9 8 4
J 8 7 4 3 2
K J 9
Q 10 4 3
A Q 6
A 8 6 5 3 2
N
WE
S
J 9 8 5
J 10 5 3
A Q 9
Q 4
5
12    10
13
A K 7 6
K 7 2
K 10 6 5
10 7

EW 4; EW 2; S 3; EW 3; EW 1N; N 2; Par −300: S 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−22005.500.502-Bingham-Cardillo vs 4-Lavine-Dick
4 ×E−12005.500.503-Rodney-Krauss vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 N31103.502.506-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
2 N31103.502.507-Lavender-Gookin vs 7-Kral-Boyd
3 W31402.004.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 E41701.005.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
4 W46200.006.005-Boyd-Reed vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
A 10
6 3
10 9 7 6 5
8 6 3 2
J 5
A Q J 2
A J 3
K Q 5 4
N
WE
S
K 9 7 4
K 10 9 8 5
K 8
J 7
4
18    10
8
Q 8 6 3 2
7 4
Q 4 2
A 10 9

EW 5; EW 4N; EW 3; EW 4; EW 2; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W56503.003.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 E56503.003.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 4-Lavine-Dick
5 E56503.003.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
4 E56503.003.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
5 E56503.003.005-Boyd-Reed vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 E56503.003.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
5 E56503.003.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 7-Kral-Boyd

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
Q 9 5 4 3
J 9
8 5
J 8 7 6
A 7
Q 8 6 5
K 9 2
A K 5 2
N
WE
S
J 10 2
A K 10 4
Q J 10 3
4 3
4
16    11
9
K 8 6
7 3 2
A 7 6 4
Q 10 9

EW 5; EW 4N; EW 4; EW 2; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W54504.002.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
4 W54504.002.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 4-Lavine-Dick
4 W54504.002.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
4 E54504.002.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender
4 W54504.002.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 7-Kral-Boyd
4 W64800.505.504-Cherlow-Lauber vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
4 W64800.505.505-Boyd-Reed vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
6 2
A K 7 5 3 2
J
10 9 8 4
A K Q 3
Q 9 8 6
A K 9 3
J
N
WE
S
8 4
J
7 5 4 2
K Q 7 6 5 3
8
19    6
7
J 10 9 7 5
10 4
Q 10 8 6
A 2

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 3; EW 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×E−23006.000.007-Lavender-Gookin vs 7-Kral-Boyd
5 W−31505.001.003-Rodney-Krauss vs 6-Tabbara-Bordcosh
3 NT×W−11004.002.005-Boyd-Reed vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 W−1503.003.004-Cherlow-Lauber vs 1-Lewis-Hopkins Jr
2 N−11002.004.002-Bingham-Cardillo vs 4-Lavine-Dick
3 W31101.005.001-Fleischer-Yaple vs 2-Gerding-Van Newkirk
3 E41300.006.006-Yudkin-Ghosh vs 5-Lavender-Lavender