Recap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
STaC Open Pairs Thursday Eve Session September 26, 2013
Scores after  9 rounds Factored to  108.0 Average      Section A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   52.72  113.88  A   3                0.79(A)  Stephen Drodge - Amber Emmons
  2   33.82   73.06  B                             George Parkins - Hannelore Sofocleous
  3   67.56  145.94  A   1                1.58(A)  Sumner Steinfeldt - Hal Hindman
  4   52.34  113.06  B   4     1          1.07(B)  Larry Taylor - Tony Robson
  5   38.46   83.08  B                             Eva Klivington - Emerita Hayward
  6   48.70  105.19  B                             Mary Ann Kral - Linda Burton
  7   57.06  123.25  A   2                1.11(A)  Bob Boyd - Vonnie Lavender
  8   49.48  106.88  C         2          0.75(B)  Ann Seeboth - Sherry Griffin
  9   49.42  106.75  B                             Bob Silverstein - Alan Dockterman

STaC Open Pairs Thursday Eve Session September 26, 2013
Scores after  9 rounds Factored to  108.0 Average      Section A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   57.69  124.62  B   2     2          1.11(A)  Albert Lauber - Jay Cherlow
  2   37.56   81.13  B                             Ann Atcheson - M. David Jackson
  3   50.14  108.31  A                             Bruce Houston - Kenneth Davis
  4   58.07  125.44  B   1     1          1.58(A)  Clifford Feldman - Robert Poriss
  5   49.65  107.25  B                             Eric Poskanzer - James Gerding
  6   48.18  104.06  B                             Thomas Jennings - Fred Gramlich
  7   53.07  114.63  A   3                0.79(A)  Thomas Lavender - Terry Lavender
  8   51.13  110.44  C   4     3          0.57(B)  Stella Perry - Daniel Barthell
  9   44.79   96.75  B                             Luther Hampton - Michael Hampton

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
9
10 9 8 7 6 3
10 5 4
K 6 4
A 10 8 7
Q 2
J 9 7
Q J 9 5
N
WE
S
K 5 3
K 5
K Q 6 2
A 10 8 7
3
10    15
12
Q J 6 4 2
A J 4
A 8 3
3 2

EW 3; EW 4; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ×N24708.000.006-Kral-Burton vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 W−1507.001.004-Taylor-Robson vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
2 S−1506.002.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 NTE44304.004.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 NTE44304.004.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 NTE44304.004.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 NTE54601.506.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 NTE54601.506.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 8-Perry-Barthell
2 ×N−35000.008.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 9-Hampton-Hampton

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 9 8 6 3
K Q 7 5
8 7
7 6
A Q 4
10 6
K Q 9 6
J 9 5 3
N
WE
S
J 5 2
9 4
A J 5
A K Q 10 8
8
12    15
5
10 7
A J 8 3 2
10 4 3 2
4 2

EW 4; EW 4; EW 2N; NS 2; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−1506.002.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 NTE−1506.002.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 NTE−1506.002.006-Kral-Burton vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 NTW−1506.002.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 NTE−1506.002.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 NTE34002.006.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 NTE34002.006.004-Taylor-Robson vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTE34002.006.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 NTE44300.008.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
9 2
K J 9
Q 9 3
Q 10 8 6 5
Q 4
A Q 8 6
K J 7 6 2
A 3
N
WE
S
K 6 3
10 5
10 8 5 4
K J 9 2
8
16    7
9
A J 10 8 7 5
7 4 3 2
A
7 4

EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; W 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−11007.001.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 E−11007.001.006-Kral-Burton vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
2 NTE−11007.001.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
2 S−1505.003.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 S−21004.004.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 W31101.506.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 W31101.506.504-Taylor-Robson vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 W31101.506.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 W31101.506.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 8-Perry-Barthell

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A K 8 5
K 10
K Q J 9 8
10 6
7 3
Q J 6 2
A 10 5 3
Q 4 3
N
WE
S
6
A 9 8 7 4 3
6 4
K J 7 2
16
9    8
7
Q J 10 9 4 2
5
7 2
A 9 8 5

NS 4; EW 4; NS 3; EW 1; Par +200: EW 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56505.003.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
4 S56505.003.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 N56505.003.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 S56505.003.004-Taylor-Robson vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 N56505.003.006-Kral-Burton vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
4 N56505.003.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 N56505.003.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 S46200.507.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 8-Perry-Barthell
4 N46200.507.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 7-Lavender-Lavender

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
9
A 9 7 3
7 6 4
A Q 9 6 4
K Q 6 5 3
8 6
10 9 2
K 7 3
N
WE
S
10 2
K Q J 5 4
Q 8 5
10 5 2
10
8    8
14
A J 8 7 4
10 2
A K J 3
J 8

NS 4N; S 4; N 5; NS 5; N 3; NS 3; S 4; Par +630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NT×N410908.000.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTN46307.001.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 NTN36005.003.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 NTN36005.003.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 NTN36005.003.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 N41303.005.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
2 S21102.006.004-Taylor-Robson vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 S−11001.007.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 S−22000.008.006-Kral-Burton vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
10 6 2
8 6 2
A 5
Q J 10 8 5
4 3
10 9 4 3
K 9 8 7 6 4
2
N
WE
S
A K Q J 9 7
K Q J 7
A 6 3
7
3    20
10
8 5
A 5
Q J 10 3 2
K 9 7 4

W 6; EW 5; E 5; EW 1N; EW 2; NS 2; Par −1100: NS 7×−5

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E56506.501.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
4 E56506.501.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 8-Perry-Barthell
4 E56506.501.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 E56506.501.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 E66802.006.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 E66802.006.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 E66802.006.004-Taylor-Robson vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 E66802.006.006-Kral-Burton vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
4 E66802.006.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 7-Lavender-Lavender

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A K 10 5 2
J 8 2
K 10 9 5 4
8 6 4
A K 4
2
A K Q 10 7 3
N
WE
S
Q 3
Q 7
A Q J 8 7 6 3
J 2
11
16    12
1
J 9 7
10 9 6 5 3
9 8 6 5 4

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; NS 1; W 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×E−38008.000.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 E−22007.001.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
5 W−11005.502.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
5 W−11005.502.506-Kral-Burton vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
4 E41303.504.504-Taylor-Robson vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 W41303.504.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 W51502.006.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 8-Perry-Barthell
5 W56001.007.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 3-Houston-Davis
5 ×N−514000.008.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A 7 2
K 10 4 2
K
K Q J 7 5
Q J 5 4 3
8 5 3
6 3
10 9 3
N
WE
S
K 9 6
J 7
J 8 7 5 4 2
6 4
16
3    5
16
10 8
A Q 9 6
A Q 10 9
A 8 2

NS 7N; NS 7; NS 7; NS 3; NS 3; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7 N715107.500.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 3-Houston-Davis
7 S715107.500.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
6 N710103.504.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 8-Perry-Barthell
6 S710103.504.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
6 N710103.504.504-Taylor-Robson vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
6 S710103.504.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
6 S710103.504.506-Kral-Burton vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
6 S710103.504.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 NTS75200.008.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 4-Feldman-Poriss

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
4
A 8 7
A J 10 3 2
K 10 9 2
A K Q 7 2
6 4
9 8
Q 8 6 4
N
WE
S
10 9 6 5
K 5
7 5 4
A J 7 3
12
11    8
9
J 8 3
Q J 10 9 3 2
K Q 6
5

NS 4; EW 3; NS 4; EW 1N; EW 2; Par +200: EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S54507.500.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 S54507.500.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 S44204.004.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
4 S44204.004.004-Taylor-Robson vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 S44204.004.006-Kral-Burton vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
4 S44204.004.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 S44204.004.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 S41701.007.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 8-Perry-Barthell
5 S−21000.008.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 7-Lavender-Lavender

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A Q 7 6 3
K J 8 4
4 2
K 3
10 8 5 4
10 9 7 3
J 9
Q J 8
N
WE
S
J 9
A 2
10 8 5
A 10 9 7 4 2
13
4    9
14
K 2
Q 6 5
A K Q 7 6 3
6 5

N 5; N 4N; N 4; S 4; N 5; S 3; S 4; EW 1; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN66907.500.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 NTN66907.500.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 NTN56606.002.006-Kral-Burton vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 NTN46304.503.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 NTN46304.503.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
4 N46203.005.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
4 N−11001.007.004-Taylor-Robson vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 N−11001.007.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 N−11001.007.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
10 7 2
10
Q J 10 9 8 3
Q 5 4
A K Q 6 5 4 3
5 2
2
9 7 3
N
WE
S
J 8
A K J 9 6
A 7
K 10 8 6
5
9    16
10
9
Q 8 7 4 3
K 6 5 4
A J 2

EW 5; EW 4N; E 3; N 4; W 2; S 3; EW 3; Par −300: N 6×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W−21008.000.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
6 W−1507.001.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
4 W44205.502.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
4 W44205.502.506-Kral-Burton vs 8-Perry-Barthell
4 W54502.006.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
4 W54502.006.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 W54502.006.004-Taylor-Robson vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 W54502.006.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 W54502.006.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
K Q 10 8
K 8 3 2
Q 9 6
8 2
4 2
9 7 6 4
10 8
K J 10 9 3
N
WE
S
J 9 7 3
10 5
K 5 4
A Q 7 4
10
4    10
16
A 6 5
A Q J
A J 7 3 2
6 5

NS 5; NS 4; NS 5; NS 2N; EW 1; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS66908.000.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 NTS46307.001.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 NTS36006.002.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
2 NTS52105.003.004-Taylor-Robson vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 NTS−11003.005.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 NTS−11003.005.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 NTS−11003.005.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 N−22000.507.506-Kral-Burton vs 8-Perry-Barthell
4 N−22000.507.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
3
7 6
A Q 8 7 6 5
10 9 7 2
J 9 8 7 5
Q J 9 3
K 10 4
5
N
WE
S
A K Q 10 4
A K 10 8 4
J 9 3
6
7    17
10
6 2
5 2
2
A K Q J 8 6 4 3

W 5; W 5; E 4; E 4; NS 4; NS 1; Par −500: NS 6×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7 ×E−25008.000.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
5 E−11006.501.504-Taylor-Robson vs 3-Houston-Davis
5 E−11006.501.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
5 ×S−12004.004.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
5 ×S−12004.004.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
5 ×S−12004.004.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
5 E56501.506.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 8-Perry-Barthell
5 W56501.506.506-Kral-Burton vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
7 ×S−38000.008.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 4-Feldman-Poriss

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
3 2
A Q 8 6 3
J 6 5
Q 8 7
A K
J 10 7
Q 10 9 4 3
10 4 2
N
WE
S
Q J 8
5 4 2
A K 2
K 9 6 5
9
10    13
8
10 9 7 6 5 4
K 9
8 7
A J 3

NS 2; NS 2; E 2; W 1; EW 1; Par +100: E 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−21007.001.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
2 NTW−21007.001.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
2 NTW−21007.001.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 W−1503.504.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 8-Perry-Barthell
2 NTW−1503.504.504-Taylor-Robson vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 W−1503.504.506-Kral-Burton vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
2 W−1503.504.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 E31101.007.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
2 NTW21200.008.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
Q 9 7 2
A K 10 3 2
J 9 7
8
J 8
8 7 6 5
K 4
A J 9 4 2
N
WE
S
A K 6
J
A Q 10 8 5 3 2
7 5
10
9    14
7
10 5 4 3
Q 9 4
6
K Q 10 6 3

EW 5; EW 2N; NS 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−11008.000.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 E51504.503.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
2 E51504.503.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 8-Perry-Barthell
4 E51504.503.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 E51504.503.504-Taylor-Robson vs 3-Houston-Davis
2 E51504.503.506-Kral-Burton vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 E51504.503.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 E61701.007.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
5 E54000.008.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 4-Feldman-Poriss

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
9 8 5 3
Q 8 5
A Q J 10 8 7
Q 10 4
6 3 2
K 6 5
K 10 9 8
N
WE
S
K 6
A K J 9 7 4
4
Q 7 5 3
9
8    13
10
A J 7 2
10
9 3 2
A J 6 4 2

NS 4; W 3; NS 4; N 2N; E 2; S 1N; EW 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×N45108.000.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
4 N44206.501.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 N44206.501.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 N31405.003.004-Taylor-Robson vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 N41304.004.006-Kral-Burton vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 N−1502.505.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 S−1502.505.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 E31400.507.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 E31400.507.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 8-Perry-Barthell

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A Q 6 5
J 8 7 5
K 9 7 5 4
10 9 4 3 2
A 2
K 8 7 3
Q 3
N
WE
S
K Q 9 4
J 10 9 6 5
A J 10 2
10
9    11
10
K J 8 7
10 6 3
A Q 4 2
8 6

EW 5; EW 2N; EW 2; W 2; N 1; E 1; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×E−11008.000.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
PassPass7.001.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 3-Houston-Davis
2 S−1505.502.504-Taylor-Robson vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
2 S−1505.502.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 8-Perry-Barthell
2 N−31503.504.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
2 E51503.504.502-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
2 E61702.006.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
2 ×S−23001.007.006-Kral-Burton vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 ×N−35000.008.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 4-Feldman-Poriss

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 8 4 2
K Q J 6 5 4
9
K 4
Q J 5
9
A K Q 8 7
A 10 7 2
N
WE
S
7 6
A 10 8 7 3
J 5 4 3 2
J
13
16    6
5
K 10 9 3
2
10 6
Q 9 8 6 5 3

EW 5; EW 2N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 1; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W41308.000.006-Kral-Burton vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 W51507.001.004-Taylor-Robson vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
2 ×N−12006.002.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
5 W54004.503.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
5 W54004.503.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 ×N−25002.006.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 ×N−25002.006.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 ×N−25002.006.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 ×N−38000.008.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
9 7 2
9 7 4
A J 8 2
A 6 4
K 10 8 5
5
Q 9 4
K Q J 7 2
N
WE
S
Q J 6 3
A K J 6
7 6 5
9 8
9
11    11
9
A 4
Q 10 8 3 2
K 10 3
10 5 3

EW 2; NS 1; NS 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−33008.000.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 E−11006.501.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 W−11006.501.506-Kral-Burton vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
PassPass5.003.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 W41703.504.504-Taylor-Robson vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 W41703.504.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
1 W52002.006.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
2 ×S−23001.007.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 E46200.008.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
9 5
A 4 3
J 10 6 2
K J 9 8
K Q 10 8
J 9 7 2
4 3
Q 4 2
N
WE
S
A J 4 3 2
Q 10 5
Q 5
A 6 3
9
8    13
10
7 6
K 8 6
A K 9 8 7
10 7 5

NS 4; NS 4; NS 1N; EW 1; EW 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−33008.000.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 E−22006.501.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 E−22006.501.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 S41305.003.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
2 E−11002.505.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 E−11002.505.504-Taylor-Robson vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 E−11002.505.506-Kral-Burton vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 E−11002.505.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
2 E21100.008.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 6
A 9 8 3
A 8 4
Q J 4 3
Q J 8 3 2
K Q 4
K 10
K 9 7
N
WE
S
10 7 5 4
10 7 6
Q 7 6 2
8 5
14
14    2
10
A 9
J 5 2
J 9 5 3
A 10 6 2

S 3; N 2; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS21208.000.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 N31107.001.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 W−21006.002.006-Kral-Burton vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 W−1504.503.504-Taylor-Robson vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 W−1504.503.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
2 NTN−11003.005.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 NTN−22001.506.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 N−22001.506.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 S−33000.008.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 9-Hampton-Hampton

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
8 2
A J 9 4
7 6
J 7 6 4 2
A Q 10 7 6
6 2
J 9 4 2
K 10
N
WE
S
J
K 8 7 5 3
A K 10 8 3
A Q
6
10    17
7
K 9 5 4 3
Q 10
Q 5
9 8 5 3

EW 6; EW 4N; EW 4; EW 4; EW 1; Par −1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E51508.000.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 8-Perry-Barthell
2 E61707.001.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
5 E56005.502.505-Klivington-Hayward vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 NTE36005.502.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
5 E66204.004.004-Taylor-Robson vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 NTE46302.006.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
3 NTE46302.006.006-Kral-Burton vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
3 NTW46302.006.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 NTE56600.008.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 3-Houston-Davis

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
A 7 5
10 4
J 9 7
A K J 9 2
9 6
Q 5 3 2
A 10 6 3
Q 10 7
N
WE
S
Q J 10 3 2
A K 8 6
Q 8
8 3
13
8    12
7
K 8 4
J 9 7
K 5 4 2
6 5 4

EW 3; W 2; NS 1N; NS 2; E 1; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS21208.000.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 E−11006.501.504-Taylor-Robson vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
2 E−11006.501.506-Kral-Burton vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
1 NTS1904.503.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 3-Houston-Davis
1 NTS1904.503.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
1 E1803.005.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 8-Perry-Barthell
1 E21102.006.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
1 NTW21201.007.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
2 W31400.008.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
J 5 4 2
8 4 3
A 6
A 9 6 3
K 7
6 2
K J 10 8 2
K 8 7 2
N
WE
S
Q 10 9 8 6
A 10 9
9 5
Q 5 4
9
10    8
13
A 3
K Q J 7 5
Q 7 4 3
J 10

NS 2; NS 1N; EW 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par +100: EW 2×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31407.500.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 3-Houston-Davis
3 S31407.500.504-Taylor-Robson vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
2 S21106.002.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
2 E−21005.003.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
3 S−1503.005.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
2 S−1503.005.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 S−1503.005.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
3 S−21000.507.503-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 S−21000.507.506-Kral-Burton vs 4-Feldman-Poriss

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
10 8 6 3 2
10
A K 2
K 9 3 2
Q 4
A Q J 4
J 10 8 6 4
J 6
N
WE
S
K
7 6 3 2
7 5 3
A 10 7 5 4
10
11    7
12
A J 9 7 5
K 9 8 5
Q 9
Q 8

NS 4; S 2N; N 1N; EW 1; EW 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S54508.000.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
4 N44204.503.501-Drodge-Emmons vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 S44204.503.504-Taylor-Robson vs 8-Perry-Barthell
4 S44204.503.506-Kral-Burton vs 3-Houston-Davis
4 S44204.503.507-Boyd-Lavender vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 S44204.503.508-Seeboth-Griffin vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
4 N44204.503.509-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
3 N41701.007.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
5 N−1500.008.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
Q 9 8 2
10 5 2
A Q
A J 10 7
J 7 3
A 8 7 4
K 8 5 2
9 3
N
WE
S
A K 10 6
J 9 6
J 7 4 3
K Q
13
8    14
5
5 4
K Q 3
10 9 6
8 6 5 4 2

W 2; EW 2; EW 2; NS 2; E 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−33007.940.063-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 S31106.251.757-Boyd-Lavender vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
2 S31106.251.759-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
2 E2904.563.444-Taylor-Robson vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 S−11002.885.131-Drodge-Emmons vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
2 NTS−11002.885.138-Seeboth-Griffin vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 E31101.196.816-Kral-Burton vs 3-Houston-Davis
1 NTE31500.067.942-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 4-Feldman-Poriss

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
K Q 10 9 2
K Q J 8 6
Q 9
Q
J 7 6 5 4 3
9
A K 8 3
A 4
N
WE
S
A 8
A 7 5
10 5 4 2
K 8 7 5
15
12    11
2
10 4 3 2
J 7 6
J 10 9 6 3 2

EW 2; NS 2; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −100: NS 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×W−35008.000.002-Parkins-Sofocleous vs 4-Feldman-Poriss
4 ×W−23007.001.007-Boyd-Lavender vs 5-Poskanzer-Gerding
4 W−21006.002.008-Seeboth-Griffin vs 7-Lavender-Lavender
3 W−1505.003.004-Taylor-Robson vs 8-Perry-Barthell
3 S−1504.004.001-Drodge-Emmons vs 2-Atcheson-Jackson
4 ×N−11003.005.003-Steinfeldt-Hindman vs 6-Jennings-Gramlich
3 W31102.006.009-Silverstein-Dockterman vs 9-Hampton-Hampton
4 W41301.007.005-Klivington-Hayward vs 1-Lauber-Cherlow
4 ×N−23000.008.006-Kral-Burton vs 3-Houston-Davis